A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Binocular summation revisited: Beyond √2.
Daniel H Baker, Freya A Lygo, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson. Psychol Bull 2018
Times Cited: 23






Login to export Results
Don't have an account? Register here

List of co-cited articles
101 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Monocular versus binocular visual acuity.
F W Campbell, D G Green. Nature 1965
303
9
39

Further developments in binocular summation.
R Blake, M Sloane, R Fox. Percept Psychophys 1981
152
8
34

A gain-control theory of binocular combination.
Jian Ding, George Sperling. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006
171
8
34

Binocular contrast vision at and above threshold.
Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson, Daniel H Baker. J Vis 2006
180
8
34

Binocular contrast summation--II. Quadratic summation.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
132
7
30

Binocular combination of luminance profiles.
Jian Ding, Dennis M Levi. J Vis 2017
14
4
28

Binocular combination of phase and contrast explained by a gain-control and gain-enhancement model.
Jian Ding, Stanley A Klein, Dennis M Levi. J Vis 2013
42
4
17

Space and time in masking and crowding.
Maria Lev, Uri Polat. J Vis 2015
28
4
17

Binocular summation of contrast remains intact in strabismic amblyopia.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Behzad Mansouri, Robert F Hess. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007
137
4
17

Binocular summation: a study of contrast sensitivity, visual acuity and recognition.
R Home. Vision Res 1978
46
4
17

Binocular Summation and Suppression of Contrast Sensitivity in Strabismus, Fusion and Amblyopia.
Michael Dorr, MiYoung Kwon, Luis Andres Lesmes, Alexandra Miller, Melanie Kazlas, Kimberley Chan, David G Hunter, Zhong-Lin Lu, Peter J Bex. Front Hum Neurosci 2019
14
4
28

Binocular contrast summation--I. Detection and discrimination.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1984
138
4
17

Binocular interaction in normal vision studied by pattern-reversal visual evoked potential (PR-VEPS).
A di Summa, A Polo, M Tinazzi, G Zanette, L Bertolasi, L G Bongiovanni, A Fiaschi. Ital J Neurol Sci 1997
14
3
21

Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data.
Eric Maris, Robert Oostenveld. J Neurosci Methods 2007
3788
3
13

A neural theory of binocular rivalry.
R Blake. Psychol Rev 1989
428
3
13

Nonlinearities in the binocular combination of luminance and contrast.
Daniel H Baker, Stuart A Wallis, Mark A Georgeson, Tim S Meese. Vision Res 2012
20
3
15

"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
38
3
13

Applying the Model-Comparison Approach to Test Specific Research Hypotheses in Psychophysical Research Using the Palamedes Toolbox.
Nicolaas Prins, Frederick A A Kingdom. Front Psychol 2018
134
3
13

Contrast and lustre: A model that accounts for eleven different forms of contrast discrimination in binocular vision.
Mark A Georgeson, Stuart A Wallis, Tim S Meese, Daniel H Baker. Vision Res 2016
24
3
13

Binocular contrast discrimination needs monocular multiplicative noise.
Jian Ding, Dennis M Levi. J Vis 2016
15
3
20

Contrast masking in human vision.
G E Legge, J M Foley. J Opt Soc Am 1980
627
3
13

Perceived direction of motion determined by adaptation to static binocular images.
Keith A May, Li Zhaoping, Paul B Hibbard. Curr Biol 2012
33
3
13

Signal detection theory in the 2AFC paradigm: attention, channel uncertainty and probability summation.
C W Tyler, C C Chen. Vision Res 2000
112
3
13

Binocular interaction: contrast matching and contrast discrimination are predicted by the same model.
Daniel H Baker, Tim S Meese, Mark A Georgeson. Spat Vis 2007
56
3
13

Binocular vision.
Randolph Blake, Hugh Wilson. Vision Res 2011
112
3
13

Binocular contrast summation and inhibition in amblyopia. The influence of the interocular difference on binocular contrast sensitivity.
S Pardhan, J Gilchrist. Doc Ophthalmol 1992
57
3
13

Binocular summation in humans: evidence for a hierarchic model.
L Frisén, B Lindblom. J Physiol 1988
37
3
13

Deficits to global motion processing in human amblyopia.
Anita J Simmers, Tim Ledgeway, Robert F Hess, Paul V McGraw. Vision Res 2003
208
3
13

Collinear stimuli regulate visual responses depending on cell's contrast threshold.
U Polat, K Mizobe, M W Pettet, T Kasamatsu, A M Norcia. Nature 1998
434
3
13

Two eyes: square root 2 better than one?
William A Simpson, Velitchko Manahilov, Uma Shahani. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2009
11
3
27

Binocular enhancement of visual acuity.
R Cagenello, A Arditi, D L Halpern. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1993
64
3
13

Binocular summation in orientation discrimination depends on stimulus contrast and duration.
M A Bearse, R D Freeman. Vision Res 1994
41
3
13

Binocular combination of stimulus orientation.
O Yehezkel, J Ding, A Sterkin, U Polat, D M Levi. R Soc Open Sci 2016
12
3
25

Amblyopia and binocular vision.
Eileen E Birch. Prog Retin Eye Res 2013
202
3
13

Binocular interactions in suprathreshold contrast perception.
G E Legge, G S Rubin. Percept Psychophys 1981
70
3
13

Binocular combination of contrast signals by striate cortical neurons in the monkey.
E L Smith, Y Chino, J Ni, H Cheng. J Neurophysiol 1997
35
3
13

ISCEV standard for clinical visual evoked potentials: (2016 update).
J Vernon Odom, Michael Bach, Mitchell Brigell, Graham E Holder, Daphne L McCulloch, Atsushi Mizota, Alma Patrizia Tormene. Doc Ophthalmol 2016
251
2
8

Binocular rivalry requires visual attention.
Peng Zhang, Keith Jamison, Stephen Engel, Bin He, Sheng He. Neuron 2011
113
2
8

Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat's visual cortex.
D H HUBEL, T N WIESEL. J Physiol 1962
6618
2
8

Some characteristics of average steady-state and transient responses evoked by modulated light.
D Regan. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1966
325
2
8

The steady-state visual evoked potential in vision research: A review.
Anthony M Norcia, L Gregory Appelbaum, Justin M Ales, Benoit R Cottereau, Bruno Rossion. J Vis 2015
385
2
8

Spatiotemporal analysis of the cortical sources of the steady-state visual evoked potential.
Francesco Di Russo, Sabrina Pitzalis, Teresa Aprile, Grazia Spitoni, Fabiana Patria, Alessandra Stella, Donatella Spinelli, Steven A Hillyard. Hum Brain Mapp 2007
203
2
8

Steady-state visually evoked potentials: focus on essential paradigms and future perspectives.
François-Benoît Vialatte, Monique Maurice, Justin Dauwels, Andrzej Cichocki. Prog Neurobiol 2010
400
2
8

Driving steady-state visual evoked potentials at arbitrary frequencies using temporal interpolation of stimulus presentation.
Søren K Andersen, Matthias M Müller. BMC Neurosci 2015
15
2
13

Single-epoch analysis of interleaved evoked potentials and fMRI responses during steady-state visual stimulation.
M Bianciardi, L Bianchi, G Garreffa, M Abbafati, F Di Russo, M G Marciani, E Macaluso. Clin Neurophysiol 2009
12
2
16

Global facilitation of attended features is obligatory and restricts divided attention.
Søren K Andersen, Steven A Hillyard, Matthias M Müller. J Neurosci 2013
37
2
8

Conflict-sensitive neurons gate interocular suppression in human visual cortex.
Sucharit Katyal, Mark Vergeer, Sheng He, Bin He, Stephen A Engel. Sci Rep 2018
14
2
14

Binocular vision: the eyes add and subtract.
Frederick A A Kingdom. Curr Biol 2012
13
2
15

Binocular luminance detection: availability of more than one central interaction.
T E Cohn, H Leong, D J Lasley. Vision Res 1981
25
2
8

Efficient Coding Theory Predicts a Tilt Aftereffect from Viewing Untilted Patterns.
Keith A May, Li Zhaoping. Curr Biol 2016
21
2
9


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.

Longstocking, LLC. © 2021
Home | About Us | FAQs | Terms & Privacy