A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Andrea C Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly K O'Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, David Moher, Micah D J Peters, Tanya Horsley, Laura Weeks, Susanne Hempel, Elie A Akl, Christine Chang, Jessie McGowan, Lesley Stewart, Lisa Hartling, Adrian Aldcroft, Michael G Wilson, Chantelle Garritty, Simon Lewin, Christina M Godfrey, Marilyn T Macdonald, Etienne V Langlois, Karla Soares-Weiser, Jo Moriarty, Tammy Clifford, Özge Tunçalp, Sharon E Straus. Ann Intern Med 2018
Times Cited: 4477







List of co-cited articles
52 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Scoping studies: advancing the methodology.
Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun, Kelly K O'Brien. Implement Sci 2010
27

Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach.
Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters, Cindy Stern, Catalin Tufanaru, Alexa McArthur, Edoardo Aromataris. BMC Med Res Methodol 2018
15

Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews.
Micah D J Peters, Christina M Godfrey, Hanan Khalil, Patricia McInerney, Deborah Parker, Cassia Baldini Soares. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2015
12

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.
David Moher, Alessandro Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Douglas G Altman. PLoS Med 2009
11

Rayyan-a web and mobile app for systematic reviews.
Mourad Ouzzani, Hossam Hammady, Zbys Fedorowicz, Ahmed Elmagarmid. Syst Rev 2016
10

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C Tricco, Danielle Pollock, Zachary Munn, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney, Christina M Godfrey, Hanan Khalil. JBI Evid Synth 2020
223
8

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.
David Moher, Larissa Shamseer, Mike Clarke, Davina Ghersi, Alessandro Liberati, Mark Petticrew, Paul Shekelle, Lesley A Stewart. Syst Rev 2015
5

Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
Laura J Damschroder, David C Aron, Rosalind E Keith, Susan R Kirsh, Jeffery A Alexander, Julie C Lowery. Implement Sci 2009
4

Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance.
Peter Craig, Paul Dieppe, Sally Macintyre, Susan Michie, Irwin Nazareth, Mark Petticrew. BMJ 2008
3

A scoping review on the conduct and reporting of scoping reviews.
Andrea C Tricco, Erin Lillie, Wasifa Zarin, Kelly O'Brien, Heather Colquhoun, Monika Kastner, Danielle Levac, Carmen Ng, Jane Pearson Sharpe, Katherine Wilson,[...]. BMC Med Res Methodol 2016
411
3

The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie, Patrick M Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy C Hoffmann, Cynthia D Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer M Tetzlaff, Elie A Akl, Sue E Brennan,[...]. BMJ 2021
3

Health literacy and public health: a systematic review and integration of definitions and models.
Kristine Sørensen, Stephan Van den Broucke, James Fullam, Gerardine Doyle, Jürgen Pelikan, Zofia Slonska, Helmut Brand. BMC Public Health 2012
3

Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews.
Micah D J Peters, Casey Marnie, Andrea C Tricco, Danielle Pollock, Zachary Munn, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney, Christina M Godfrey, Hanan Khalil. JBI Evid Implement 2021
29
10

A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency.
Mai T Pham, Andrijana Rajić, Judy D Greig, Jan M Sargeant, Andrew Papadopoulos, Scott A McEwen. Res Synth Methods 2014
757
3

Conducting high quality scoping reviews-challenges and solutions.
Hanan Khalil, Micah Dj Peters, Andrea C Tricco, Danielle Pollock, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney, Christina M Godfrey, Zachary Munn. J Clin Epidemiol 2021
16
18


Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study.
Wichor M Bramer, Melissa L Rethlefsen, Jos Kleijnen, Oscar H Franco. Syst Rev 2017
314
3

Applying systematic review search methods to the grey literature: a case study examining guidelines for school-based breakfast programs in Canada.
Katelyn Godin, Jackie Stapleton, Sharon I Kirkpatrick, Rhona M Hanning, Scott T Leatherdale. Syst Rev 2015
173
3

Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting.
Heather L Colquhoun, Danielle Levac, Kelly K O'Brien, Sharon Straus, Andrea C Tricco, Laure Perrier, Monika Kastner, David Moher. J Clin Epidemiol 2014
855
3

The integrative review: updated methodology.
Robin Whittemore, Kathleen Knafl. J Adv Nurs 2005
2

Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review.
Romina Pace, Pierre Pluye, Gillian Bartlett, Ann C Macaulay, Jon Salsberg, Justin Jagosh, Robbyn Seller. Int J Nurs Stud 2012
552
2


The global burden of mental, neurological and substance use disorders: an analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010.
Harvey A Whiteford, Alize J Ferrari, Louisa Degenhardt, Valery Feigin, Theo Vos. PLoS One 2015
541
2

Strategies to support transitions from hospital to home for children with medical complexity: A scoping review.
Sydney Breneol, Julia Belliveau, Christine Cassidy, Janet A Curran. Int J Nurs Stud 2017
25
8

Low health literacy and health outcomes: an updated systematic review.
Nancy D Berkman, Stacey L Sheridan, Katrina E Donahue, David J Halpern, Karen Crotty. Ann Intern Med 2011
2


Medication therapy management services: definitions and outcomes.
Annette N Pellegrino, Michelle T Martin, Jessica J Tilton, Daniel R Touchette. Drugs 2009
80
2

Undertaking a scoping review: A practical guide for nursing and midwifery students, clinicians, researchers, and academics.
Danielle Pollock, Ellen L Davies, Micah D J Peters, Andrea C Tricco, Lyndsay Alexander, Patricia McInerney, Christina M Godfrey, Hanan Khalil, Zachary Munn. J Adv Nurs 2021
25
8

Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process.
Jessica Peterson, Patricia F Pearce, Laurie Anne Ferguson, Cynthia A Langford. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract 2017
129
2

The evolving concept of health literacy.
Don Nutbeam. Soc Sci Med 2008
2

Health literacy and health actions: a review and a framework from health psychology.
Christian von Wagner, Andrew Steptoe, Michael S Wolf, Jane Wardle. Health Educ Behav 2009
199
2

The meaning and the measure of health literacy.
David W Baker. J Gen Intern Med 2006
570
2

The development of software to support multiple systematic review types: the Joanna Briggs Institute System for the Unified Management, Assessment and Review of Information (JBI SUMARI).
Zachary Munn, Edoardo Aromataris, Catalin Tufanaru, Cindy Stern, Kylie Porritt, James Farrow, Craig Lockwood, Matthew Stephenson, Sandeep Moola, Lucylynn Lizarondo,[...]. Int J Evid Based Healthc 2019
148
2

An Evidence-Based Approach to Scoping Reviews.
Hanan Khalil, Micah Peters, Christina M Godfrey, Patricia McInerney, Cassia Baldini Soares, Deborah Parker. Worldviews Evid Based Nurs 2016
165
2

De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.
Wichor M Bramer, Dean Giustini, Gerdien B de Jonge, Leslie Holland, Tanja Bekhuis. J Med Libr Assoc 2016
362
2

QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Penny F Whiting, Anne W S Rutjes, Marie E Westwood, Susan Mallett, Jonathan J Deeks, Johannes B Reitsma, Mariska M G Leeflang, Jonathan A C Sterne, Patrick M M Bossuyt. Ann Intern Med 2011
2

Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies.
Kristin L Carman, Pam Dardess, Maureen Maurer, Shoshanna Sofaer, Karen Adams, Christine Bechtel, Jennifer Sweeney. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013
708
2

Methodological quality and synthesis of case series and case reports.
Mohammad Hassan Murad, Shahnaz Sultan, Samir Haffar, Fateh Bazerbachi. BMJ Evid Based Med 2018
713
2

PRESS Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies: 2015 Guideline Statement.
Jessie McGowan, Margaret Sampson, Douglas M Salzwedel, Elise Cogo, Vicki Foerster, Carol Lefebvre. J Clin Epidemiol 2016
2

What are scoping studies? A review of the nursing literature.
Kathy Davis, Nick Drey, Dinah Gould. Int J Nurs Stud 2009
318
2

Feasibility of Using Mobile ECG Recording Technology to Detect Atrial Fibrillation in Low-Resource Settings.
Grahame F Evans, Arianna Shirk, Peter Muturi, Elsayed Z Soliman. Glob Heart 2017
19
10

Exploring the Association Between Self-Reported Asthma Impact and Fitbit-Derived Sleep Quality and Physical Activity Measures in Adolescents.
Jiang Bian, Yi Guo, Mengjun Xie, Alice E Parish, Isaac Wardlaw, Rita Brown, François Modave, Dong Zheng, Tamara T Perry. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2017
22
9

WEARCON: wearable home monitoring in children with asthma reveals a strong association with hospital based assessment of asthma control.
M R van der Kamp, E C Klaver, B J Thio, J M M Driessen, F H C de Jongh, M Tabak, J van der Palen, H J Hermens. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 2020
7
28

Wearables and the medical revolution.
Jessilyn Dunn, Ryan Runge, Michael Snyder. Per Med 2018
108
2

Methodological quality of case series studies: an introduction to the JBI critical appraisal tool.
Zachary Munn, Timothy Hugh Barker, Sandeep Moola, Catalin Tufanaru, Cindy Stern, Alexa McArthur, Matthew Stephenson, Edoardo Aromataris. JBI Evid Synth 2020
114
2


Practical Guidance for Knowledge Synthesis: Scoping Review Methods.
Craig Lockwood, Kelli Borgess Dos Santos, Robin Pap. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci) 2019
31
6

Evaluation of Undergraduate Students' Responsiveness to a 4-Week University-Based Animal-Assisted Stress Prevention Program.
Patricia Pendry, Stephanie Kuzara, Nancy R Gee. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2019
6
33

Presence of a dog reduces subjective but not physiological stress responses to an analog trauma.
Johanna Lass-Hennemann, Peter Peyk, Markus Streb, Elena Holz, Tanja Michael. Front Psychol 2014
21
9



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.