A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Daniele Carrieri, Heidi C Howard, Caroline Benjamin, Angus J Clarke, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Naomi Hawkins, Tanya F Halbersma-Konings, Leigh Jackson, Hülya Kayserili, Susan E Kelly, Anneke M Lucassen, Álvaro Mendes, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Vigdís Stefánsdóttir, Peter D Turnpenny, Carla G van El, Irene M van Langen, Martina C Cornel, Francesca Forzano. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
Times Cited: 38

List of co-cited articles
472 articles co-cited >1

Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Karen L David, Robert G Best, Leslie Manace Brenman, Lynn Bush, Joshua L Deignan, David Flannery, Jodi D Hoffman, Ingrid Holm, David T Miller, James O'Leary,[...]. Genet Med 2019

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
Yvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James, Gail P Jarvik, Jennifer B McCormick, Tanya N Nelson, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019

Is there a duty to recontact in light of new genetic technologies? A systematic review of the literature.
Ellen Otten, Mirjam Plantinga, Erwin Birnie, Marian A Verkerk, Anneke M Lucassen, Adelita V Ranchor, Irene M Van Langen. Genet Med 2015

Recontacting or not recontacting? A survey of current practices in clinical genetics centres in Europe.
Fabio Sirchia, Daniele Carrieri, Sandi Dheensa, Caroline Benjamin, Hülya Kayserili, Christophe Cordier, Carla G van El, Peter D Turnpenny, Bela Melegh, Álvaro Mendes,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018

Prevalence of Variant Reclassification Following Hereditary Cancer Genetic Testing.
Jacqueline Mersch, Nichole Brown, Sara Pirzadeh-Miller, Erin Mundt, Hannah C Cox, Krystal Brown, Melissa Aston, Lisa Esterling, Susan Manley, Theodora Ross. JAMA 2018

Recontacting in clinical practice: an investigation of the views of healthcare professionals and clinical scientists in the United Kingdom.
Daniele Carrieri, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Angus J Clarke, Peter D Turnpenny, Anneke M Lucassen, Susan E Kelly. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Recontact in clinical practice: a survey of clinical genetics services in the United Kingdom.
Daniele Carrieri, Anneke M Lucassen, Angus J Clarke, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Peter D Turnpenny, Susan E Kelly. Genet Med 2016

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017

A 'joint venture' model of recontacting in clinical genomics: challenges for responsible implementation.
Sandi Dheensa, Daniele Carrieri, Susan Kelly, Angus Clarke, Shane Doheny, Peter Turnpenny, Anneke Lucassen. Eur J Med Genet 2017

Recontacting in clinical practice: the views and expectations of patients in the United Kingdom.
Daniele Carrieri, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Angus J Clarke, Peter D Turnpenny, Anneke M Lucassen, Susan E Kelly. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Making new genetic diagnoses with old data: iterative reanalysis and reporting from genome-wide data in 1,133 families with developmental disorders.
Caroline F Wright, Jeremy F McRae, Stephen Clayton, Giuseppe Gallone, Stuart Aitken, Tomas W FitzGerald, Philip Jones, Elena Prigmore, Diana Rajan, Jenny Lord,[...]. Genet Med 2018

Recontacting in light of new genetic diagnostic techniques for patients with intellectual disability: Feasibility and parental perspectives.
Gea Beunders, Melodi Dekker, Oscar Haver, Hanne J Meijers-Heijboer, Lidewij Henneman. Eur J Med Genet 2018

Genetic Misdiagnoses and the Potential for Health Disparities.
Arjun K Manrai, Birgit H Funke, Heidi L Rehm, Morten S Olesen, Bradley A Maron, Peter Szolovits, David M Margulies, Joseph Loscalzo, Isaac S Kohane. N Engl J Med 2016

Analysis of VUS reporting, variant reinterpretation and recontact policies in clinical genomic sequencing consent forms.
Danya F Vears, Emilia Niemiec, Heidi Carmen Howard, Pascal Borry. Eur J Hum Genet 2018

Observed frequency and challenges of variant reclassification in a hereditary cancer clinic.
Sarah Macklin, Nisha Durand, Paldeep Atwal, Stephanie Hines. Genet Med 2018

Communicating new knowledge on previously reported genetic variants.
Samuel J Aronson, Eugene H Clark, Matthew Varugheese, Samantha Baxter, Lawrence J Babb, Heidi L Rehm. Genet Med 2012

Reinterpretation of sequence variants: one diagnostic laboratory's experience, and the need for standard guidelines.
Caitlin Chisholm, Hussein Daoud, Mahdi Ghani, Gabrielle Mettler, Jean McGowan-Jordan, Liz Sinclair-Bourque, Amanda Smith, Olga Jarinova. Genet Med 2018

ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource.
Heidi L Rehm, Jonathan S Berg, Lisa D Brooks, Carlos D Bustamante, James P Evans, Melissa J Landrum, David H Ledbetter, Donna R Maglott, Christa Lese Martin, Robert L Nussbaum,[...]. N Engl J Med 2015

Systematic reanalysis of clinical exome data yields additional diagnoses: implications for providers.
Aaron M Wenger, Harendra Guturu, Jonathan A Bernstein, Gill Bejerano. Genet Med 2017

The impact of variant classification on the clinical management of hereditary cancer syndromes.
Scott A Turner, Smita K Rao, R Hayes Morgan, Cindy L Vnencak-Jones, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2019

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013

Letter: Relearning the 3 R's? Reinterpretation, recontact, and return of genetic variants.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Adrian Thorogood, Ma'n H Zawati. Genet Med 2019

The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015

Whole-exome sequencing reanalysis at 12 months boosts diagnosis and is cost-effective when applied early in Mendelian disorders.
Lisa J Ewans, Deborah Schofield, Rupendra Shrestha, Ying Zhu, Velimir Gayevskiy, Kevin Ying, Corrina Walsh, Eric Lee, Edwin P Kirk, Alison Colley,[...]. Genet Med 2018

Prospective Study of Cancer Genetic Variants: Variation in Rate of Reclassification by Ancestry.
Thomas P Slavin, Lily R Van Tongeren, Carolyn E Behrendt, Ilana Solomon, Christina Rybak, Bita Nehoray, Lili Kuzmich, Mariana Niell-Swiller, Kathleen R Blazer, Shu Tao,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2018

Genetic Evaluation of Cardiomyopathy-A Heart Failure Society of America Practice Guideline.
Ray E Hershberger, Michael M Givertz, Carolyn Y Ho, Daniel P Judge, Paul F Kantor, Kim L McBride, Ana Morales, Matthew R G Taylor, Matteo Vatta, Stephanie M Ware. J Card Fail 2018

The Promise and Peril of Precision Medicine: Phenotyping Still Matters Most.
Jaeger P Ackerman, Daniel C Bartos, Jamie D Kapplinger, David J Tester, Brian P Delisle, Michael J Ackerman. Mayo Clin Proc 2016

Physicians' duty to recontact and update genetic advice.
Yvonne A Stevens, Grant D Senner, Gary E Marchant. Per Med 2017

Points to consider in the reevaluation and reanalysis of genomic test results: a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Joshua L Deignan, Wendy K Chung, Hutton M Kearney, Kristin G Monaghan, Catherine W Rehder, Elizabeth C Chao. Genet Med 2019

Rescreening for genetic mutations using multi-gene panel testing in patients who previously underwent non-informative genetic screening.
Melissa K Frey, Sarah H Kim, Rebecca Yee Bassett, Jessica Martineau, Emily Dalton, Jing-Yi Chern, Stephanie V Blank. Gynecol Oncol 2015

Clinical evaluation of a multiple-gene sequencing panel for hereditary cancer risk assessment.
Allison W Kurian, Emily E Hare, Meredith A Mills, Kerry E Kingham, Lisa McPherson, Alice S Whittemore, Valerie McGuire, Uri Ladabaum, Yuya Kobayashi, Stephen E Lincoln,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2014

Is there a duty to reinterpret genetic data? The ethical dimensions.
Paul S Appelbaum, Erik Parens, Sara M Berger, Wendy K Chung, Wylie Burke. Genet Med 2020

Lynch Syndrome Limbo: Patient Understanding of Variants of Uncertain Significance.
Ilana Solomon, Elizabeth Harrington, Gillian Hooker, Lori Erby, Jennifer Axilbund, Heather Hampel, Kara Semotiuk, Amie Blanco, William M P Klein, Francis Giardiello,[...]. J Genet Couns 2017

Clinical Cardiovascular Genetic Counselors Take a Leading Role in Team-based Variant Classification.
Chloe Reuter, Megan E Grove, Kate Orland, Katherine Spoonamore, Colleen Caleshu. J Genet Couns 2018

Determining pathogenicity of genetic variants in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: importance of periodic reassessment.
Jipin Das K, Jodie Ingles, Richard D Bagnall, Christopher Semsarian. Genet Med 2014

Communication of genetic information to families with inherited rhythm disorders.
Charlotte Burns, Cynthia James, Jodie Ingles. Heart Rhythm 2018

Attitudes, knowledge and consequences of uncertain genetic findings in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Charlotte Burns, Laura Yeates, Catherine Spinks, Christopher Semsarian, Jodie Ingles. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Multiple Gene Variants in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy in the Era of Next-Generation Sequencing.
Charlotte Burns, Richard D Bagnall, Lien Lam, Christopher Semsarian, Jodie Ingles. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2017

HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA).
Michael J Ackerman, Silvia G Priori, Stephan Willems, Charles Berul, Ramon Brugada, Hugh Calkins, A John Camm, Patrick T Ellinor, Michael Gollob, Robert Hamilton,[...]. Heart Rhythm 2011

Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.
Monkol Lek, Konrad J Karczewski, Eric V Minikel, Kaitlin E Samocha, Eric Banks, Timothy Fennell, Anne H O'Donnell-Luria, James S Ware, Andrew J Hill, Beryl B Cummings,[...]. Nature 2016

Psychosocial impact of specialized cardiac genetic clinics for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Jodie Ingles, Joanne M Lind, Philayrath Phongsavan, Christopher Semsarian. Genet Med 2008

Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008

Clinically impactful differences in variant interpretation between clinicians and testing laboratories: a single-center experience.
Austin Bland, Elizabeth A Harrington, Kyla Dunn, Mitchel Pariani, Julia C K Platt, Megan E Grove, Colleen Caleshu. Genet Med 2018

Classification of Genes: Standardized Clinical Validity Assessment of Gene-Disease Associations Aids Diagnostic Exome Analysis and Reclassifications.
Erica D Smith, Kelly Radtke, Mari Rossi, Deepali N Shinde, Sourat Darabi, Dima El-Khechen, Zöe Powis, Katherine Helbig, Kendra Waller, Dorothy K Grange,[...]. Hum Mutat 2017

Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.