A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Catherine M Stein, Roselle Ponsaran, Erika S Trapl, Aaron J Goldenberg. Genet Med 2019
Times Cited: 5







List of co-cited articles
105 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
59
60

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
209
60

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
38
60

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
56
60

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
58
60

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
59
60

Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
25
60

Understanding What Information Is Valued By Research Participants, And Why.
Consuelo H Wilkins, Brandy M Mapes, Rebecca N Jerome, Victoria Villalta-Gil, Jill M Pulley, Paul A Harris. Health Aff (Millwood) 2019
23
60

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018
18
60

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
902
60

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
114
60

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
7
60

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
12
40

Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
42
40

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
40

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
20
40

Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives.
Jill B Gaieski, Linda Patrick-Miller, Brian L Egleston, Kara N Maxwell, Sarah Walser, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Amanda Ganzak, Danielle McKenna,[...]. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019
10
40

Informed consent for exome sequencing research in families with genetic disease: the emerging issue of incidental findings.
Amanda L Bergner, Juli Bollinger, Karen S Raraigh, Crystal Tichnell, Brittney Murray, Carrie Lynn Blout, Aida Bytyci Telegrafi, Cynthia A James. Am J Med Genet A 2014
29
40

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
88
40

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
40


Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
34
40

Genetic susceptibility testing versus family history-based risk assessment: Impact on perceived risk of Alzheimer disease.
Susan LaRusse, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Heather Katzen, Erin L Linnenbringer, Melissa Barber, Peter Whitehouse, Kimberly Quaid, Tamsen Brown, Robert C Green,[...]. Genet Med 2005
40
40

Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.
Douglas B Pet, Ingrid A Holm, Janet L Williams, Melanie F Myers, Laurie L Novak, Kyle B Brothers, Georgia L Wiesner, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2019
27
40


Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
9
40

What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research?
Colin Me Halverson, Sarah H Jones, Laurie Novak, Christopher Simpson, Digna R Velez Edwards, Sifang Kathy Zhao, Ellen W Clayton. J Pers Med 2020
5
40

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
16
40

Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.
Xuan Zhu, Emma R Leof, Kari G Rabe, Jennifer B McCormick, Gloria M Petersen, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. Public Health Genomics 2018
3
66

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
46
40


Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.
Jonathan Gooblar, Catherine M Roe, Natalie J Selsor, Matthew J Gabel, John C Morris. JAMA Neurol 2015
23
40

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
67
40

Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Evette J Ludman, Scarlett Hopkins, Rosalina D James, Theresa J Hoeft, Annie Kinegak, Henry Lupie, Ralph Kinegak, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke. Am J Med Genet A 2015
20
40

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
51
40

Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete Watt Boolsen, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Ole Mors. Hum Genomics 2018
10
40

A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone.
Kurt D Christensen, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Erin Linnenbringer, Peter J Whitehouse, Charmaine D M Royal, Thomas O Obisesan, L Adrienne Cupples, Melissa B Butson, Grace-Ann Fasaye,[...]. Genet Med 2018
27
40

Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete W Boolsen, Kristoffer S Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas F Hansen, Anna Middleton, Ole Mors. Am J Med Genet A 2017
16
40

Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
Julia Wynn, Katie Lewis, Laura M Amendola, Barbara A Bernhardt, Sawona Biswas, Manasi Joshi, Carmit McMullen, Sarah Scollon. BMC Med Genomics 2018
38
40

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
127
40

A comparison of genome cohort participants' genetic knowledge and preferences to receive genetic results before and after a genetics workshop.
Kayono Yamamoto, Atsushi Shimizu, Fumie Aizawa, Hiroshi Kawame, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Akimune Fukushima. J Hum Genet 2018
8
40

Whole-Exome Sequencing of 10 Scientists: Evaluation of the Process and Outcomes.
Noralane M Lindor, Kimberly A Schahl, Kiley J Johnson, Katherine S Hunt, Kara A Mensink, Eric D Wieben, Eric Klee, John L Black, W Edward Highsmith, Stephen N Thibodeau,[...]. Mayo Clin Proc 2015
8
40

Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.
Shannon Rego, Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld, Stephanie A Bivona, Michael P Snyder, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2019
7
40

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
161
40

Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.
Kristin M Kostick, Cody Brannan, Stacey Pereira, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019
12
40


Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Christian M Simon, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
35
40

Opening the "black box" of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Celine Lewis, Christine Patch, Melissa Hill, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Lyn S Chitty. Genet Med 2019
9
40

Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.
Kristin Kostick, Stacey Pereira, Cody Brannan, Laura Torgerson, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Genet Med 2020
4
50

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Emilie S Zoltick, Michael D Linderman, Molly A McGinniss, Erica Ramos, Madeleine P Ball, George M Church, Debra G B Leonard, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire, C Thomas Caskey,[...]. Genome Med 2019
23
40


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.