A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Joel E Pacyna, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Sarah M Jenkins, Erica J Sutton, Caroline Horrow, Iftikhar J Kullo, Richard R Sharp. J Med Genet 2019
Times Cited: 13







List of co-cited articles
24 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Making pretest genomic counseling optional: lessons from the RAVE study.
Erica J Sutton, Iftikhar J Kullo, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2018
11
45

Effects of informed consent for individual genome sequencing on relevant knowledge.
K A Kaphingst, F M Facio, M-R Cheng, S Brooks, H Eidem, A Linn, B B Biesecker, L G Biesecker. Clin Genet 2012
79
30

The Return of Actionable Variants Empirical (RAVE) Study, a Mayo Clinic Genomic Medicine Implementation Study: Design and Initial Results.
Iftikhar J Kullo, Janet Olson, Xiao Fan, Merin Jose, Maya Safarova, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Erin Winkler, David C Kochan, Sara Snipes, Joel E Pacyna,[...]. Mayo Clin Proc 2018
19
30


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
799
23

The past, present and future of service delivery in genetic counseling: Keeping up in the era of precision medicine.
Katie Stoll, Shobana Kubendran, Stephanie A Cohen. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018
54
23

Validation of screening questions for limited health literacy in a large VA outpatient population.
Lisa D Chew, Joan M Griffin, Melissa R Partin, Siamak Noorbaloochi, Joseph P Grill, Annamay Snyder, Katharine A Bradley, Sean M Nugent, Alisha D Baines, Michelle Vanryn. J Gen Intern Med 2008
763
23

DECIDE: a Decision Support Tool to Facilitate Parents' Choices Regarding Genome-Wide Sequencing.
Patricia Birch, S Adam, N Bansback, R R Coe, J Hicklin, A Lehman, K C Li, J M Friedman. J Genet Couns 2016
20
15

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
15

Validation of a decisional conflict scale.
A M O'Connor. Med Decis Making 1995
15

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
67
15

The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results.
Yvonne Bombard, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Selina Casalino, Emily Glogowski, Kasmintan Schrader, Michael Evans, Adena Scheer, Nancy Baxter,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
18
15

Web Platform vs In-Person Genetic Counselor for Return of Carrier Results From Exome Sequencing: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Barbara B Biesecker, Katie L Lewis, Kendall L Umstead, Jennifer J Johnston, Erin Turbitt, Kristen P Fishler, John H Patton, Ilana M Miller, Alexis R Heidlebaugh, Leslie G Biesecker. JAMA Intern Med 2018
42
15

Computerized prenatal genetic testing decision-assisting tool: a randomized controlled trial.
Miriam Kuppermann, Mary E Norton, Elena Gates, Steven E Gregorich, Lee A Learman, Sanae Nakagawa, Vickie A Feldstein, James Lewis, A Eugene Washington, Robert F Nease. Obstet Gynecol 2009
57
15

Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale.
M Holmes-Rovner, J Kroll, N Schmitt, D R Rovner, M L Breer, M L Rothert, G Padonu, G Talarczyk. Med Decis Making 1996
386
15

Informed consent for whole genome sequencing: a qualitative analysis of participant expectations and perceptions of risks, benefits, and harms.
Holly K Tabor, Jacquie Stock, Tracy Brazg, Margaret J McMillin, Karin M Dent, Joon-Ho Yu, Jay Shendure, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2012
82
15

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
20
15

Genomics is failing on diversity.
Alice B Popejoy, Stephanie M Fullerton. Nature 2016
518
15

Expanded carrier screening: what determines intended participation and can this be influenced by message framing and narrative information?
Jan S Voorwinden, Anne H Buitenhuis, Erwin Birnie, Anneke M Lucassen, Marian A Verkerk, Irene M van Langen, Mirjam Plantinga, Adelita V Ranchor. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
12
16

Developing a conceptual, reproducible, rubric-based approach to consent and result disclosure for genetic testing by clinicians with minimal genetics background.
Kelly E Ormond, Miranda L G Hallquist, Adam H Buchanan, Danielle Dondanville, Mildred K Cho, Maureen Smith, Myra Roche, Kyle B Brothers, Curtis R Coughlin, Laura Hercher,[...]. Genet Med 2019
22
15

Developing patient-friendly genetic and genomic test reports: formats to promote patient engagement and understanding.
Susanne B Haga, Rachel Mills, Kathryn I Pollak, Catherine Rehder, Adam H Buchanan, Isaac M Lipkus, Jennifer H Crow, Michael Datto. Genome Med 2014
37
15

The nuanced negative: Meanings of a negative diagnostic result in clinical exome sequencing.
Debra Skinner, Kelly A Raspberry, Martha King. Sociol Health Illn 2016
34
15

Personalized genomic results: analysis of informational needs.
Tara J Schmidlen, Lisa Wawak, Rachel Kasper, J Felipe García-España, Michael F Christman, Erynn S Gordon. J Genet Couns 2014
24
15

The Mayo Clinic Biobank: a building block for individualized medicine.
Janet E Olson, Euijung Ryu, Kiley J Johnson, Barbara A Koenig, Karen J Maschke, Jody A Morrisette, Mark Liebow, Paul Y Takahashi, Zachary S Fredericksen, Ruchi G Sharma,[...]. Mayo Clin Proc 2013
132
15

Chromosomal microarray versus karyotyping for prenatal diagnosis.
Ronald J Wapner, Christa Lese Martin, Brynn Levy, Blake C Ballif, Christine M Eng, Julia M Zachary, Melissa Savage, Lawrence D Platt, Daniel Saltzman, William A Grobman,[...]. N Engl J Med 2012
643
7

When genotype is not predictive of phenotype: implications for genetic counseling based on 21,594 chromosomal microarray analysis examinations.
Idit Maya, Reuven Sharony, Shiri Yacobson, Sarit Kahana, Josepha Yeshaya, Tamar Tenne, Ifaat Agmon-Fishman, Lital Cohen-Vig, Yael Goldberg, Racheli Berger,[...]. Genet Med 2018
27
7

Noninvasive whole-genome sequencing of a human fetus.
Jacob O Kitzman, Matthew W Snyder, Mario Ventura, Alexandra P Lewis, Ruolan Qiu, Lavone E Simmons, Hilary S Gammill, Craig E Rubens, Donna A Santillan, Jeffrey C Murray,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2012
240
7

The use of chromosomal microarray for prenatal diagnosis.
Lorraine Dugoff, Mary E Norton, Jeffrey A Kuller. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2016
62
7

Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study.
Jane L Halliday, Cecile Muller, Taryn Charles, Fiona Norris, Joanne Kennedy, Sharon Lewis, Bettina Meiser, Susan Donath, Zornitza Stark, George McGillivray,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
11
9

Role of late amniocentesis in the era of modern genomic technologies.
H Daum, A Ben David, M Nadjari, S Zenvirt, S Helman, N Yanai, V Meiner, S Yagel, A Frumkin, S Shkedi Rafid. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019
7
14

Implementation of genomic arrays in prenatal diagnosis: the Belgian approach to meet the challenges.
Olivier Vanakker, Catheline Vilain, Katrien Janssens, Nathalie Van der Aa, Guillaume Smits, Claude Bandelier, Bettina Blaumeiser, Saskia Bulk, Jean-Hubert Caberg, Anne De Leener,[...]. Eur J Med Genet 2014
61
7


Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results.
Barbara A Bernhardt, Danielle Soucier, Karen Hanson, Melissa S Savage, Laird Jackson, Ronald J Wapner. Genet Med 2013
129
7

Application of SNP array for rapid prenatal diagnosis: implementation, genetic counselling and diagnostic flow.
Malgorzata Srebniak, Marjan Boter, Grétel Oudesluijs, Marieke Joosten, Lutgarde Govaerts, Diane Van Opstal, Robert-Jan H Galjaard. Eur J Hum Genet 2011
74
7


The Psychological Impact of Prenatal Diagnosis and Disclosure of Susceptibility Loci: First Impressions of Parents' Experiences.
S L van der Steen, S R Riedijk, J Verhagen-Visser, L C P Govaerts, M I Srebniak, D Van Opstal, M Joosten, M F C M Knapen, A Tibben, K E M Diderich,[...]. J Genet Couns 2016
26
7

Pregnant couples at increased risk for common aneuploidies choose maximal information from invasive genetic testing.
S L van der Steen, K E M Diderich, S R Riedijk, J Verhagen-Visser, L C P Govaerts, M Joosten, M F C M Knapen, D Van Opstal, M I Srebniak, A Tibben,[...]. Clin Genet 2015
32
7

Chromosomal microarray vs. NIPS: analysis of 5541 low-risk pregnancies.
Lena Sagi-Dain, Lital Cohen Vig, Sarit Kahana, Shiri Yacobson, Tamar Tenne, Ifat Agmon-Fishman, Cochava Klein, Reut Matar, Lina Basel-Salmon, Idit Maya. Genet Med 2019
31
7

What results to disclose, when, and who decides? Healthcare professionals' views on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis.
Shiri Shkedi-Rafid, Angela Fenwick, Sandi Dheensa, Diana Wellesley, Anneke M Lucassen. Prenat Diagn 2016
20
7

Microarray-based cell-free DNA analysis improves noninvasive prenatal testing.
Kara Juneau, Patrick E Bogard, Stephanie Huang, Morassa Mohseni, Eric T Wang, Paul Ryvkin, Christopher Kingsley, Craig A Struble, Arnold Oliphant, Jacob M Zahn. Fetal Diagn Ther 2014
47
7


"If it helps..." the use of microarray technology in prenatal testing: patient and partners reflections.
Sarah C Hillman, John Skelton, Elizabeth Quinlan-Jones, Amie Wilson, Mark D Kilby. Am J Med Genet A 2013
26
7

Frequency of submicroscopic chromosomal aberrations in pregnancies without increased risk for structural chromosomal aberrations: systematic review and meta-analysis.
M I Srebniak, M Joosten, M F C M Knapen, L R Arends, M Polak, S van Veen, A T J I Go, D Van Opstal. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2018
40
7

Maternal plasma DNA sequencing reveals the genome-wide genetic and mutational profile of the fetus.
Y M Dennis Lo, K C Allen Chan, Hao Sun, Eric Z Chen, Peiyong Jiang, Fiona M F Lun, Yama W Zheng, Tak Y Leung, Tze K Lau, Charles R Cantor,[...]. Sci Transl Med 2010
567
7

Testing personalized medicine: patient and physician expectations of next-generation genomic sequencing in late-stage cancer care.
Fiona A Miller, Robin Z Hayeems, Jessica P Bytautas, Philippe L Bedard, Scott Ernst, Hal Hirte, Sebastien Hotte, Amit Oza, Albiruni Razak, Stephen Welch,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2014
59
7

Diagnostic Yield of Clinical Tumor and Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing for Children With Solid Tumors.
D Williams Parsons, Angshumoy Roy, Yaping Yang, Tao Wang, Sarah Scollon, Katie Bergstrom, Robin A Kerstein, Stephanie Gutierrez, Andrea K Petersen, Abhishek Bavle,[...]. JAMA Oncol 2016
217
7

Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.
Dawn Stacey, France Légaré, Krystina Lewis, Michael J Barry, Carol L Bennett, Karen B Eden, Margaret Holmes-Rovner, Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas, Anne Lyddiatt, Richard Thomson,[...]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017
7

Development of patient "profiles" to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results.
Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Marc Clausen, Selina Casalino, Salma Shickh, Laura McCuaig, Esha Joshi, Seema Panchal, Tracy Graham, Melyssa Aronson,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
5
20

Revealing the incidentalome when targeting the tumor genome.
Yvonne Bombard, Mark Robson, Kenneth Offit. JAMA 2013
47
7

Genetic counseling for BRCA1/2: a randomized controlled trial of two strategies to facilitate the education and counseling process.
Catharine Wang, Richard Gonzalez, Kara J Milliron, Victor J Strecher, Sofia D Merajver. Am J Med Genet A 2005
54
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.