A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
Times Cited: 7







List of co-cited articles
114 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.
Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Kari G Chaffee, Marguerite E Robinson, Deborah R Gordon, Noralane M Lindor, Barbara A Koenig. J Law Med Ethics 2015
21
71

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
38
57

Attitudes of parents toward the return of targeted and incidental genomic research findings in children.
Conrad V Fernandez, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Colleen O'Connell, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Meghan Ferguson, Kym M Boycott, Poul H Sorensen,[...]. Genet Med 2014
65
57

Genomic inheritances: disclosing individual research results from whole-exome sequencing to deceased participants' relatives.
Ben Chan, Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Sara Chandros Hull, Leslie G Biesecker, Benjamin E Berkman. Am J Bioeth 2012
44
42

Attitudes of Canadian researchers toward the return to participants of incidental and targeted genomic findings obtained in a pediatric research setting.
Conrad V Fernandez, Caron Strahlendorf, Denise Avard, Bartha M Knoppers, Colleen O'Connell, Eric Bouffet, David Malkin, Nada Jabado, Kym Boycott, Poul H Sorensen. Genet Med 2013
36
42

Attitudes Toward Return of Genetic Research Results to Relatives, Including After Death: Comparison of Cancer Probands, Blood Relatives, and Spouse/Partners.
Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Susan M Wolf, Kari G Chaffee, Marguerite E Robinson, Noralane M Lindor, Deborah R Gordon, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018
5
60

Discordance in selected designee for return of genomic findings in the event of participant death and estate executor.
Jessie L Goodman, Laura M Amendola, Martha Horike-Pyne, Susan B Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Wylie Burke, Gail P Jarvik. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2017
5
60

Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Rebecca Branum, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen, Susan A Berry, Laura M Beskow, Mary B Daly, Conrad V Fernandez, Robert C Green, Bonnie S LeRoy,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2015
61
42


Patients' Choices for Return of Exome Sequencing Results to Relatives in the Event of Their Death.
Laura M Amendola, Martha Horike-Pyne, Susan B Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Barbara J Evans, Wylie Burke, Gail P Jarvik. J Law Med Ethics 2015
15
42


Public's attitudes on participation in a biobank for research: an Italian survey.
Corinna Porteri, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Elena Togni, Michael Parker. BMC Med Ethics 2014
33
42

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018
16
42

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
42

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
57
42

Attitudes of African Americans toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Holly K Tabor, Michael J Bamshad. Am J Med Genet A 2013
56
42

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
42

Attitudes of non-African American focus group participants toward return of results from exome and whole genome sequencing.
Joon-Ho Yu, Julia Crouch, Seema M Jamal, Michael J Bamshad, Holly K Tabor. Am J Med Genet A 2014
37
42


Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.
Laura A Siminoff, Heather M Traino, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura Barker, Glencora Gudger, Anita Undale. Genet Med 2016
18
42

Pragmatic Tools for Sharing Genomic Research Results with the Relatives of Living and Deceased Research Participants.
Susan M Wolf, Emily Scholtes, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen, Susan A Berry, Laura M Beskow, Mary B Daly, Conrad V Fernandez, Robert C Green, Bonnie S LeRoy,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2018
7
28

Stakeholders' perspectives on biobank-based genomic research: systematic review of the literature.
Alma Husedzinovic, Dominik Ose, Christoph Schickhardt, Stefan Fröhling, Eva C Winkler. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
30
28

Disclosure of genetics research results after the death of the patient participant: a qualitative study of the impact on relatives.
E Ormondroyd, C Moynihan, M Watson, C Foster, S Davolls, A Ardern-Jones, R Eeles. J Genet Couns 2007
32
28

Biobanking and deceased persons.
Anne Marie Tassé. Hum Genet 2011
12
28

Ethical aspects of sudden cardiac arrest research using observational data: a narrative review.
Marieke A R Bak, Marieke T Blom, Hanno L Tan, Dick L Willems. Crit Care 2018
9
28

Informed consent for return of incidental findings in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Cameron R Waldman, Abby Fyer, Robert Klitzman, Erik Parens, Josue Martinez, W Nicholson Price, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2014
46
28

The emergence of an ethical duty to disclose genetic research results: international perspectives.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Yann Joly, Jacques Simard, Francine Durocher. Eur J Hum Genet 2006
196
28


Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
37
28

Perspectives regarding family disclosure of genetic research results in three racial and ethnic minority populations.
Xuan Zhu, Susanna N Basappa, Jennifer L Ridgeway, Monica L Albertie, Elizabeth Pantoja, Darin Prescott, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. J Community Genet 2020
2
100

Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Harriet J A Teare, Jane Kaye, Stephan Beck, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Luciana Caenazzo, Clive Collett, Flavio D'Abramo, Heike Felzmann, Teresa Finlay,[...]. BMC Med Ethics 2017
85
28

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
28

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
28


Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
33
28

Genetic susceptibility testing versus family history-based risk assessment: Impact on perceived risk of Alzheimer disease.
Susan LaRusse, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Heather Katzen, Erin L Linnenbringer, Melissa Barber, Peter Whitehouse, Kimberly Quaid, Tamsen Brown, Robert C Green,[...]. Genet Med 2005
40
28

Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.
Douglas B Pet, Ingrid A Holm, Janet L Williams, Melanie F Myers, Laurie L Novak, Kyle B Brothers, Georgia L Wiesner, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2019
26
28


Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
9
28

What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research?
Colin Me Halverson, Sarah H Jones, Laurie Novak, Christopher Simpson, Digna R Velez Edwards, Sifang Kathy Zhao, Ellen W Clayton. J Pers Med 2020
4
50

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
5
40

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
15
28

Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.
Xuan Zhu, Emma R Leof, Kari G Rabe, Jennifer B McCormick, Gloria M Petersen, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. Public Health Genomics 2018
3
66

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
45
28


Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.
Jonathan Gooblar, Catherine M Roe, Natalie J Selsor, Matthew J Gabel, John C Morris. JAMA Neurol 2015
20
28

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
66
28

Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Evette J Ludman, Scarlett Hopkins, Rosalina D James, Theresa J Hoeft, Annie Kinegak, Henry Lupie, Ralph Kinegak, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke. Am J Med Genet A 2015
18
28

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
51
28

Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete Watt Boolsen, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Ole Mors. Hum Genomics 2018
10
28


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.