A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
Times Cited: 45







List of co-cited articles
219 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
936
33

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
26

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
254
22

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
306
17

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
Yvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James, Gail P Jarvik, Jennifer B McCormick, Tanya N Nelson, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019
56
15

Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Frances P Lawrenz, Charles A Nelson, Jeffrey P Kahn, Mildred K Cho, Ellen Wright Clayton, Joel G Fletcher, Michael K Georgieff, Dale Hammerschmidt, Kathy Hudson,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2008
477
13


Disclosure of individual genetic data to research participants: the debate reconsidered.
Annelien L Bredenoord, Hester Y Kroes, Edwin Cuppen, Michael Parker, Johannes J M van Delden. Trends Genet 2011
153
13

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
13

Return of results: ethical and legal distinctions between research and clinical care.
Wylie Burke, Barbara J Evans, Gail P Jarvik. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2014
74
11

Ethical and practical guidelines for reporting genetic research results to study participants: updated guidelines from a National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute working group.
Richard R Fabsitz, Amy McGuire, Richard R Sharp, Mona Puggal, Laura M Beskow, Leslie G Biesecker, Ebony Bookman, Wylie Burke, Esteban Gonzalez Burchard, George Church,[...]. Circ Cardiovasc Genet 2010
286
11

Return of research results from genomic biobanks: cost matters.
Marianna J Bledsoe, Ellen Wright Clayton, Amy L McGuire, William E Grizzle, P Pearl O'Rourke, Nikolajs Zeps. Genet Med 2013
42
11


Return of genetic and genomic research findings: experience of a pediatric biorepository.
Tanya Papaz, Eriskay Liston, Laura Zahavich, Dimitri J Stavropoulos, Rebekah K Jobling, Raymond H Kim, Miriam Reuter, Anastasia Miron, Erwin Oechslin, Tapas Mondal,[...]. BMC Med Genomics 2019
11
45

The law of incidental findings in human subjects research: establishing researchers' duties.
Susan M Wolf, Jordan Paradise, Charlisse Caga-anan. J Law Med Ethics 2008
72
8

Broad consent versus dynamic consent in biobank research: is passive participation an ethical problem?
Kristin Solum Steinsbekk, Bjørn Kåre Myskja, Berge Solberg. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
128
8

Public expectations for return of results from large-cohort genetic research.
Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa LeRoy, Kathy Hudson. Am J Bioeth 2008
210
8

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
16
25

Feedback of individual genetic results to research participants: in favor of a qualified disclosure policy.
Annelien L Bredenoord, N Charlotte Onland-Moret, Johannes J M Van Delden. Hum Mutat 2011
88
8

Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study.
M Ragan Hart, Barbara B Biesecker, Carrie L Blout, Kurt D Christensen, Laura M Amendola, Katie L Bergstrom, Sawona Biswas, Kevin M Bowling, Kyle B Brothers, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2019
68
8

Population studies: return of research results and incidental findings Policy Statement.
Bartha Maria Knoppers, Mylène Deschênes, Ma'n H Zawati, Anne Marie Tassé. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
72
8

APPLaUD: access for patients and participants to individual level uninterpreted genomic data.
Adrian Thorogood, Jason Bobe, Barbara Prainsack, Anna Middleton, Erick Scott, Sarah Nelson, Manuel Corpas, Natasha Bonhomme, Laura Lyman Rodriguez, Madeleine Murtagh,[...]. Hum Genomics 2018
32
12

Returning a Research Participant's Genomic Results to Relatives: Analysis and Recommendations.
Susan M Wolf, Rebecca Branum, Barbara A Koenig, Gloria M Petersen, Susan A Berry, Laura M Beskow, Mary B Daly, Conrad V Fernandez, Robert C Green, Bonnie S LeRoy,[...]. J Law Med Ethics 2015
60
8

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
86
8

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
39
10

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
59
8

Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
27
14

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
74
8

Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research.
Melanie Goisauf, Gillian Martin, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Lars Ursin, Anna Durnová, Liis Leitsalu, Katharine Smith, Sara Casati, Marialuisa Lavitrano,[...]. PLoS One 2019
7
57

Dynamic Consent: a potential solution to some of the challenges of modern biomedical research.
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Harriet J A Teare, Jane Kaye, Stephan Beck, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Luciana Caenazzo, Clive Collett, Flavio D'Abramo, Heike Felzmann, Teresa Finlay,[...]. BMC Med Ethics 2017
98
8


Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
214
8

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
115
8


Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
258
6

Recontacting patients in clinical genetics services: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Daniele Carrieri, Heidi C Howard, Caroline Benjamin, Angus J Clarke, Sandi Dheensa, Shane Doheny, Naomi Hawkins, Tanya F Halbersma-Konings, Leigh Jackson, Hülya Kayserili,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
39
7

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Karen L David, Robert G Best, Leslie Manace Brenman, Lynn Bush, Joshua L Deignan, David Flannery, Jodi D Hoffman, Ingrid Holm, David T Miller, James O'Leary,[...]. Genet Med 2019
54
6

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
163
6

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
138
6

Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sirpa Soini, Helena Machado, Jane Kaye, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Flavio D'Abramo, Michał Witt, Geneviève Schamps,[...]. Biopreserv Biobank 2016
14
21

Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.
Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim, Benjamin E Berkman, David Wendler, Annette Rid, Javed Khan, Tom Badgett, Sara Chandros Hull. Pediatrics 2013
56
6


Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks.
Jane Kaye, Edgar A Whitley, David Lund, Michael Morrison, Harriet Teare, Karen Melham. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
238
6

Identifying public expectations of genetic biobanks.
Christine Critchley, Dianne Nicol, Rebekah McWhirter. Public Underst Sci 2017
18
16

Actionable, pathogenic incidental findings in 1,000 participants' exomes.
Michael O Dorschner, Laura M Amendola, Emily H Turner, Peggy D Robertson, Brian H Shirts, Carlos J Gallego, Robin L Bennett, Kelly L Jones, Mari J Tokita, James T Bennett,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2013
277
6

Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results.
Rachel B Ramoni, Amy L McGuire, Jill Oliver Robinson, Debra S Morley, Sharon E Plon, Steven Joffe. Genet Med 2013
39
7

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
58
6

Technical report: Ethical and policy issues in genetic testing and screening of children.
Lainie Friedman Ross, Howard M Saal, Karen L David, Rebecca R Anderson. Genet Med 2013
266
6

Funding considerations for the disclosure of genetic incidental findings in biobank research.
L Black, D Avard, M H Zawati, B M Knoppers, J Hébert, G Sauvageau. Clin Genet 2013
17
17



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.