A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Kelly E Ormond, Julianne M O'Daniel, Sarah S Kalia. J Genet Couns 2019
Times Cited: 12







List of co-cited articles
33 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
720
83

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
58

Points to consider for laboratories reporting results from diagnostic genomic sequencing.
D F Vears, K Sénécal, A J Clarke, L Jackson, A M Laberge, L Lovrecic, A Piton, K L I Van Gassen, H G Yntema, B M Knoppers,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
22
25

Whole-genome sequencing in health care: recommendations of the European Society of Human Genetics.
Carla G van El, Martina C Cornel, Pascal Borry, Ros J Hastings, Florence Fellmann, Shirley V Hodgson, Heidi C Howard, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Bartha M Knoppers, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
194
25

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
101
25


Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
77
25

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
25


ClinGen--the Clinical Genome Resource.
Heidi L Rehm, Jonathan S Berg, Lisa D Brooks, Carlos D Bustamante, James P Evans, Melissa J Landrum, David H Ledbetter, Donna R Maglott, Christa Lese Martin, Robert L Nussbaum,[...]. N Engl J Med 2015
445
25


The clinical application of genome-wide sequencing for monogenic diseases in Canada: Position Statement of the Canadian College of Medical Geneticists.
Kym Boycott, Taila Hartley, Shelin Adam, Francois Bernier, Karen Chong, Bridget A Fernandez, Jan M Friedman, Michael T Geraghty, Stacey Hume, Bartha M Knoppers,[...]. J Med Genet 2015
107
16

Views of genetics health professionals on the return of genomic results.
Megan E Grove, Maya N Wolpert, Mildred K Cho, Sandra Soo-Jin Lee, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014
35
16

Secondary findings from whole-exome/genome sequencing evaluating stakeholder perspectives. A review of the literature.
J Delanne, S Nambot, A Chassagne, O Putois, A Pelissier, C Peyron, E Gautier, J Thevenon, E Cretin, A L Bruel,[...]. Eur J Med Genet 2019
11
18

A semiquantitative metric for evaluating clinical actionability of incidental or secondary findings from genome-scale sequencing.
Jonathan S Berg, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Julianne M O'Daniel, Jessica K Booker, Lacey Boshe, Timothy Carey, Kristy R Crooks, Brian C Jensen, Eric T Juengst, Kristy Lee,[...]. Genet Med 2016
46
16


Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
59
16

Guidelines for diagnostic next-generation sequencing.
Gert Matthijs, Erika Souche, Mariëlle Alders, Anniek Corveleyn, Sebastian Eck, Ilse Feenstra, Valérie Race, Erik Sistermans, Marc Sturm, Marjan Weiss,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
205
16

Actionable exomic incidental findings in 6503 participants: challenges of variant classification.
Laura M Amendola, Michael O Dorschner, Peggy D Robertson, Joseph S Salama, Ragan Hart, Brian H Shirts, Mitzi L Murray, Mari J Tokita, Carlos J Gallego, Daniel Seung Kim,[...]. Genome Res 2015
201
16

Interpretation of Genomic Sequencing Results in Healthy and Ill Newborns: Results from the BabySeq Project.
Ozge Ceyhan-Birsoy, Jaclyn B Murry, Kalotina Machini, Matthew S Lebo, Timothy W Yu, Shawn Fayer, Casie A Genetti, Talia S Schwartz, Pankaj B Agrawal, Richard B Parad,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019
47
16

Rethinking the "open future" argument against predictive genetic testing of children.
Jeremy R Garrett, John D Lantos, Leslie G Biesecker, Janet E Childerhose, Wendy K Chung, Ingrid A Holm, Barbara A Koenig, Jean E McEwen, Benjamin S Wilfond, Kyle Brothers. Genet Med 2019
13
16

ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype.
Melissa J Landrum, Jennifer M Lee, George R Riley, Wonhee Jang, Wendy S Rubinstein, Deanna M Church, Donna R Maglott. Nucleic Acids Res 2014
16

The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores.
Ali Torkamani, Nathan E Wineinger, Eric J Topol. Nat Rev Genet 2018
299
16

Patient re-contact after revision of genomic test results: points to consider-a statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG).
Karen L David, Robert G Best, Leslie Manace Brenman, Lynn Bush, Joshua L Deignan, David Flannery, Jodi D Hoffman, Ingrid Holm, David T Miller, James O'Leary,[...]. Genet Med 2019
32
16

ClinVar: public archive of interpretations of clinically relevant variants.
Melissa J Landrum, Jennifer M Lee, Mark Benson, Garth Brown, Chen Chao, Shanmuga Chitipiralla, Baoshan Gu, Jennifer Hart, Douglas Hoffman, Jeffrey Hoover,[...]. Nucleic Acids Res 2016
16


Guidelines for return of research results from pediatric genomic studies: deliberations of the Boston Children's Hospital Gene Partnership Informed Cohort Oversight Board.
Ingrid A Holm, Sarah K Savage, Robert C Green, Eric Juengst, Amy McGuire, Susan Kornetsky, Stephanie J Brewster, Steven Joffe, Patrick Taylor. Genet Med 2014
36
16

The Responsibility to Recontact Research Participants after Reinterpretation of Genetic and Genomic Research Results.
Yvonne Bombard, Kyle B Brothers, Sara Fitzgerald-Butt, Nanibaa' A Garrison, Leila Jamal, Cynthia A James, Gail P Jarvik, Jennifer B McCormick, Tanya N Nelson, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2019
35
16

False-positive results released by direct-to-consumer genetic tests highlight the importance of clinical confirmation testing for appropriate patient care.
Stephany Tandy-Connor, Jenna Guiltinan, Kate Krempely, Holly LaDuca, Patrick Reineke, Stephanie Gutierrez, Phillip Gray, Brigette Tippin Davis. Genet Med 2018
95
16

Managing incidental findings and research results in genomic research involving biobanks and archived data sets.
Susan M Wolf, Brittney N Crock, Brian Van Ness, Frances Lawrenz, Jeffrey P Kahn, Laura M Beskow, Mildred K Cho, Michael F Christman, Robert C Green, Ralph Hall,[...]. Genet Med 2012
275
16

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
221
16

Genome-wide polygenic scores for common diseases identify individuals with risk equivalent to monogenic mutations.
Amit V Khera, Mark Chaffin, Krishna G Aragam, Mary E Haas, Carolina Roselli, Seung Hoan Choi, Pradeep Natarajan, Eric S Lander, Steven A Lubitz, Patrick T Ellinor,[...]. Nat Genet 2018
636
16

Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
22
16

Towards a European consensus for reporting incidental findings during clinical NGS testing.
Jayne Y Hehir-Kwa, Mireille Claustres, Ros J Hastings, Conny van Ravenswaaij-Arts, Gabrielle Christenhusz, Maurizio Genuardi, Béla Melegh, Anne Cambon-Thomsen, Philippos Patsalis, Joris Vermeesch,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2015
54
8

Processes and preliminary outputs for identification of actionable genes as incidental findings in genomic sequence data in the Clinical Sequencing Exploratory Research Consortium.
Jonathan S Berg, Laura M Amendola, Christine Eng, Eliezer Van Allen, Stacy W Gray, Nikhil Wagle, Heidi L Rehm, Elizabeth T DeChene, Matthew C Dulik, Fuki M Hisama,[...]. Genet Med 2013
85
8


Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate.
Marlies Saelaert, Heidi Mertes, Elfride De Baere, Ignaas Devisch. Eur J Hum Genet 2018
9
11



A survey of current practices for genomic sequencing test interpretation and reporting processes in US laboratories.
Julianne M O'Daniel, Heather M McLaughlin, Laura M Amendola, Sherri J Bale, Jonathan S Berg, David Bick, Kevin M Bowling, Elizabeth C Chao, Wendy K Chung, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2017
44
8

Newborn, carrier, and early childhood screening recommendations for fragile X.
Liane Abrams, Amy Cronister, William T Brown, Flora Tassone, Stephanie L Sherman, Brenda Finucane, Allyn McConkie-Rosell, Randi Hagerman, Walter E Kaufmann, Jonathan Picker,[...]. Pediatrics 2012
25
8

"Not Tied Up Neatly with a Bow": Professionals' Challenging Cases in Informed Consent for Genomic Sequencing.
Ashley N Tomlinson, Debra Skinner, Denise L Perry, Sarah R Scollon, Myra I Roche, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2016
36
8

Methods of data collection in qualitative research: interviews and focus groups.
P Gill, K Stewart, E Treasure, B Chadwick. Br Dent J 2008
305
8


Clinical genetic counselors: An asset in the era of precision medicine.
Catherine A L Wicklund, Debra A Duquette, Amy L Swanson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2018
7
14


A closer look at the recommended criteria for disclosing genetic results: perspectives of medical genetic specialists, genomic researchers, and institutional review board chairs.
Debra S Brandt, Laura Shinkunas, Stephen L Hillis, Sandra E Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack, Nancy R Downing, Megan F Liu, Lisa L Shah, Janet K Williams, Christian M Simon. J Genet Couns 2013
21
8

Personal utility in genomic testing: is there such a thing?
Eline M Bunnik, A Cecile J W Janssens, Maartje H N Schermer. J Med Ethics 2015
54
8




Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.