A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Shannon Rego, Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld, Stephanie A Bivona, Michael P Snyder, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2019
Times Cited: 7







List of co-cited articles
111 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Emilie S Zoltick, Michael D Linderman, Molly A McGinniss, Erica Ramos, Madeleine P Ball, George M Church, Debra G B Leonard, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire, C Thomas Caskey,[...]. Genome Med 2019
21
57

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
57

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
70
57

ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
42


Psychological and behavioural impact of returning personal results from whole-genome sequencing: the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, Randi Zinberg, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, George A Diaz, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
35
42

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
14
42

The return of unexpected research results in a biobank study and referral to health care for heritable long QT syndrome.
A Haukkala, E Kujala, P Alha, V Salomaa, S Koskinen, H Swan, H Kääriäinen. Public Health Genomics 2013
24
42

Participant use and communication of findings from exome sequencing: a mixed-methods study.
Katie L Lewis, Gillian W Hooker, Philip D Connors, Travis C Hyams, Martha F Wright, Samantha Caldwell, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2016
46
42

Returning negative results to individuals in a genomic screening program: lessons learned.
Rita M Butterfield, James P Evans, Christine Rini, Kristine J Kuczynski, Margaret Waltz, R Jean Cadigan, Katrina A B Goddard, Kristin R Muessig, Gail E Henderson. Genet Med 2019
20
28

A Model for Genome-First Care: Returning Secondary Genomic Findings to Participants and Their Healthcare Providers in a Large Research Cohort.
Marci L B Schwartz, Cara Zayac McCormick, Amanda L Lazzeri, D'Andra M Lindbuchler, Miranda L G Hallquist, Kandamurugu Manickam, Adam H Buchanan, Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Monica A Giovanni, Lauren Frisbie,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2018
61
28

Why Patients Decline Genomic Sequencing Studies: Experiences from the CSER Consortium.
Laura M Amendola, Jill O Robinson, Ragan Hart, Sawona Biswas, Kaitlyn Lee, Barbara A Bernhardt, Kelly East, Marian J Gilmore, Tia L Kauffman, Katie L Lewis,[...]. J Genet Couns 2018
18
28

Assessing the implications of positive genomic screening results.
Margaret Waltz, Karen M Meagher, Gail E Henderson, Katrina Ab Goddard, Kristin Muessig, Jonathan S Berg, Karen E Weck, R Jean Cadigan. Per Med 2020
4
50

Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
86
28

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
28


Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
33
28

Genetic susceptibility testing versus family history-based risk assessment: Impact on perceived risk of Alzheimer disease.
Susan LaRusse, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Heather Katzen, Erin L Linnenbringer, Melissa Barber, Peter Whitehouse, Kimberly Quaid, Tamsen Brown, Robert C Green,[...]. Genet Med 2005
40
28

Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.
Douglas B Pet, Ingrid A Holm, Janet L Williams, Melanie F Myers, Laurie L Novak, Kyle B Brothers, Georgia L Wiesner, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2019
26
28


Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
9
28

What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research?
Colin Me Halverson, Sarah H Jones, Laurie Novak, Christopher Simpson, Digna R Velez Edwards, Sifang Kathy Zhao, Ellen W Clayton. J Pers Med 2020
4
50

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
5
40

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
57
28

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
15
28

Psychological Impact of Learning CDKN2A Variant Status as a Genetic Research Result.
Xuan Zhu, Emma R Leof, Kari G Rabe, Jennifer B McCormick, Gloria M Petersen, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. Public Health Genomics 2018
3
66

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
45
28


Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.
Jonathan Gooblar, Catherine M Roe, Natalie J Selsor, Matthew J Gabel, John C Morris. JAMA Neurol 2015
20
28

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
66
28

Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Evette J Ludman, Scarlett Hopkins, Rosalina D James, Theresa J Hoeft, Annie Kinegak, Henry Lupie, Ralph Kinegak, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke. Am J Med Genet A 2015
18
28

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
51
28

Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete Watt Boolsen, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Ole Mors. Hum Genomics 2018
10
28

A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone.
Kurt D Christensen, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Erin Linnenbringer, Peter J Whitehouse, Charmaine D M Royal, Thomas O Obisesan, L Adrienne Cupples, Melissa B Butson, Grace-Ann Fasaye,[...]. Genet Med 2018
26
28

Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete W Boolsen, Kristoffer S Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas F Hansen, Anna Middleton, Ole Mors. Am J Med Genet A 2017
16
28

Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
Julia Wynn, Katie Lewis, Laura M Amendola, Barbara A Bernhardt, Sawona Biswas, Manasi Joshi, Carmit McMullen, Sarah Scollon. BMC Med Genomics 2018
34
28

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
124
28

A comparison of genome cohort participants' genetic knowledge and preferences to receive genetic results before and after a genetics workshop.
Kayono Yamamoto, Atsushi Shimizu, Fumie Aizawa, Hiroshi Kawame, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Akimune Fukushima. J Hum Genet 2018
8
28

Whole-Exome Sequencing of 10 Scientists: Evaluation of the Process and Outcomes.
Noralane M Lindor, Kimberly A Schahl, Kiley J Johnson, Katherine S Hunt, Kara A Mensink, Eric D Wieben, Eric Klee, John L Black, W Edward Highsmith, Stephen N Thibodeau,[...]. Mayo Clin Proc 2015
8
28

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
159
28

Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.
Kristin M Kostick, Cody Brannan, Stacey Pereira, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019
12
28

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
38
28


Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Christian M Simon, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
35
28

Opening the "black box" of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Celine Lewis, Christine Patch, Melissa Hill, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Lyn S Chitty. Genet Med 2019
8
28

Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.
Kristin Kostick, Stacey Pereira, Cody Brannan, Laura Torgerson, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Genet Med 2020
4
50


Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
51
28

Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.
David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa Leroy, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008
60
28

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
55
28


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.