A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Xuan Zhu, Emma R Leof, Kari G Rabe, Jennifer B McCormick, Gloria M Petersen, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf. Public Health Genomics 2018
Times Cited: 1







List of co-cited articles
articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Parental attitudes, values, and beliefs toward the return of results from exome sequencing in children.
J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
85
100

Researchers' views on informed consent for return of secondary results in genomic research.
Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Josue Martinez, Erik Parens, Yuan Zhang, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2015
13
100


Engaging African-Americans about biobanks and the return of research results.
Colin Me Halverson, Lainie Friedman Ross. J Community Genet 2012
32
100

Genetic susceptibility testing versus family history-based risk assessment: Impact on perceived risk of Alzheimer disease.
Susan LaRusse, J Scott Roberts, Theresa M Marteau, Heather Katzen, Erin L Linnenbringer, Melissa Barber, Peter Whitehouse, Kimberly Quaid, Tamsen Brown, Robert C Green,[...]. Genet Med 2005
39
100

Physicians' perspectives on receiving unsolicited genomic results.
Douglas B Pet, Ingrid A Holm, Janet L Williams, Melanie F Myers, Laurie L Novak, Kyle B Brothers, Georgia L Wiesner, Ellen W Clayton. Genet Med 2019
26
100


Parental attitudes and expectations towards receiving genomic test results in healthy children.
Alanna Kulchak Rahm, Lindsay Bailey, Kara Fultz, Audrey Fan, Janet L Williams, Adam Buchanan, F Daniel Davis, Michael F Murray, Marc S Williams. Transl Behav Med 2018
8
100

What Results Should Be Returned from Opportunistic Screening in Translational Research?
Colin Me Halverson, Sarah H Jones, Laurie Novak, Christopher Simpson, Digna R Velez Edwards, Sifang Kathy Zhao, Ellen W Clayton. J Pers Med 2020
4
100

Controversies among Cancer Registry Participants, Genomic Researchers, and Institutional Review Boards about Returning Participants' Genomic Results.
Karen L Edwards, Deborah Goodman, Catherine O Johnson, Lari Wenzel, Celeste Condit, Deborah Bowen. Public Health Genomics 2018
3
100

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
55
100

Population-based biobank participants' preferences for receiving genetic test results.
Kayono Yamamoto, Tsuyoshi Hachiya, Akimune Fukushima, Naoki Nakaya, Akira Okayama, Kozo Tanno, Fumie Aizawa, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Atsushi Hozawa, Atsushi Shimizu. J Hum Genet 2017
13
100

Preparing Medical Specialists for Genomic Medicine: Continuing Education Should Include Opportunities for Experiential Learning.
Belinda J McClaren, Erin Crellin, Monika Janinski, Amy E Nisselle, Larissa Ng, Sylvia A Metcalfe, Clara L Gaff. Front Genet 2020
15
100

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
43
100


Attitudes of Research Participants and the General Public Regarding Disclosure of Alzheimer Disease Research Results.
Jonathan Gooblar, Catherine M Roe, Natalie J Selsor, Matthew J Gabel, John C Morris. JAMA Neurol 2015
18
100

Communication of biobanks' research results: what do (potential) participants want?
Tineke M Meulenkamp, Sjef K Gevers, Jasper A Bovenberg, Gerard H Koppelman, Astrid van Hylckama Vlieg, Ellen M A Smets. Am J Med Genet A 2010
63
100

Community dissemination and genetic research: moving beyond results reporting.
Susan Brown Trinidad, Evette J Ludman, Scarlett Hopkins, Rosalina D James, Theresa J Hoeft, Annie Kinegak, Henry Lupie, Ralph Kinegak, Bert B Boyer, Wylie Burke. Am J Med Genet A 2015
16
100

The preferences of potential stakeholders in psychiatric genomic research regarding consent procedures and information delivery.
Anna Sundby, Merete Watt Boolsen, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Anna Middleton, Ole Mors. Eur Psychiatry 2019
7
100

IRB perspectives on the return of individual results from genomic research.
Lynn G Dressler, Sondra Smolek, Roselle Ponsaran, Janell M Markey, Helene Starks, Nancy Gerson, Susan Lewis, Nancy Press, Eric Juengst, Georgia L Wiesner. Genet Med 2012
48
100

Attitudes of stakeholders in psychiatry towards the inclusion of children in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete Watt Boolsen, Kristoffer Sølvsten Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas Folkmann Hansen, Ole Mors. Hum Genomics 2018
10
100

A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone.
Kurt D Christensen, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Erin Linnenbringer, Peter J Whitehouse, Charmaine D M Royal, Thomas O Obisesan, L Adrienne Cupples, Melissa B Butson, Grace-Ann Fasaye,[...]. Genet Med 2018
22
100

Readiness of clinical genetic healthcare professionals to provide genomic medicine: An Australian census.
Amy Nisselle, Ivan Macciocca, Fiona McKenzie, Hannah Vuong, Kate Dunlop, Belinda McClaren, Sylvia Metcalfe, Clara Gaff. J Genet Couns 2019
15
100

Stakeholders in psychiatry and their attitudes toward receiving pertinent and incident findings in genomic research.
Anna Sundby, Merete W Boolsen, Kristoffer S Burgdorf, Henrik Ullum, Thomas F Hansen, Anna Middleton, Ole Mors. Am J Med Genet A 2017
16
100

Clinical providers' experiences with returning results from genomic sequencing: an interview study.
Julia Wynn, Katie Lewis, Laura M Amendola, Barbara A Bernhardt, Sawona Biswas, Manasi Joshi, Carmit McMullen, Sarah Scollon. BMC Med Genomics 2018
32
100

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
122
100

A comparison of genome cohort participants' genetic knowledge and preferences to receive genetic results before and after a genetics workshop.
Kayono Yamamoto, Atsushi Shimizu, Fumie Aizawa, Hiroshi Kawame, Tomoharu Tokutomi, Akimune Fukushima. J Hum Genet 2018
7
100

3
100

Dynamic consent: a possible solution to improve patient confidence and trust in how electronic patient records are used in medical research.
Hawys Williams, Karen Spencer, Caroline Sanders, David Lund, Edgar A Whitley, Jane Kaye, William G Dixon. JMIR Med Inform 2015
54
100

Whole-Exome Sequencing of 10 Scientists: Evaluation of the Process and Outcomes.
Noralane M Lindor, Kimberly A Schahl, Kiley J Johnson, Katherine S Hunt, Kara A Mensink, Eric D Wieben, Eric Klee, John L Black, W Edward Highsmith, Stephen N Thibodeau,[...]. Mayo Clin Proc 2015
7
100

Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.
Shannon Rego, Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld, Stephanie A Bivona, Michael P Snyder, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2019
6
100

Decision role preferences for return of results from genome sequencing amongst young breast cancer patients.
Cindy B Matsen, Sarah Lyons, Melody S Goodman, Barbara B Biesecker, Kimberly A Kaphingst. Patient Educ Couns 2019
8
100

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
157
100


Psychiatric genetics researchers' views on offering return of results to individual participants.
Kristin M Kostick, Cody Brannan, Stacey Pereira, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2019
12
100

Biobank participants' preferences for disclosure of genetic research results: perspectives from the OurGenes, OurHealth, OurCommunity project.
Nicole L Allen, Elizabeth W Karlson, Susan Malspeis, Bing Lu, Christine E Seidman, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann. Mayo Clin Proc 2014
34
100


Informed consent and genomic incidental findings: IRB chair perspectives.
Christian M Simon, Janet K Williams, Laura Shinkunas, Debra Brandt, Sandra Daack-Hirsch, Martha Driessnack. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2011
34
100

Opening the "black box" of informed consent appointments for genome sequencing: a multisite observational study.
Saskia C Sanderson, Celine Lewis, Christine Patch, Melissa Hill, Maria Bitner-Glindzicz, Lyn S Chitty. Genet Med 2019
6
100

Psychiatric genomics researchers' perspectives on best practices for returning results to individual participants.
Kristin Kostick, Stacey Pereira, Cody Brannan, Laura Torgerson, Gabriel Lázaro-Muñoz. Genet Med 2020
4
100

Predispositional genome sequencing in healthy adults: design, participant characteristics, and early outcomes of the PeopleSeq Consortium.
Emilie S Zoltick, Michael D Linderman, Molly A McGinniss, Erica Ramos, Madeleine P Ball, George M Church, Debra G B Leonard, Stacey Pereira, Amy L McGuire, C Thomas Caskey,[...]. Genome Med 2019
17
100


Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
47
100

Ethical implications of including children in a large biobank for genetic-epidemiologic research: a qualitative study of public opinion.
David Kaufman, Gail Geller, Lisa Leroy, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2008
59
100

Returning incidental findings from genetic research to children: views of parents of children affected by rare diseases.
Erika Kleiderman, Bartha Maria Knoppers, Conrad V Fernandez, Kym M Boycott, Gail Ouellette, Durhane Wong-Rieger, Shelin Adam, Julie Richer, Denise Avard. J Med Ethics 2014
53
100

Preferences for the Return of Individual Results From Research on Pediatric Biobank Samples.
Kurt D Christensen, Sarah K Savage, Noelle L Huntington, Elissa R Weitzman, Sonja I Ziniel, Phoebe L Bacon, Cara N Cacioppo, Robert C Green, Ingrid A Holm. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2017
9
100


Research participants' experiences with return of genetic research results and preferences for web-based alternatives.
Jill B Gaieski, Linda Patrick-Miller, Brian L Egleston, Kara N Maxwell, Sarah Walser, Laura DiGiovanni, Jamie Brower, Dominique Fetzer, Amanda Ganzak, Danielle McKenna,[...]. Mol Genet Genomic Med 2019
9
100

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
13
100

Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results.
Robyn Hylind, Maureen Smith, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Sharon Aufox. J Community Genet 2018
10
100


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.