A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
10 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


The timecourse of expression aftereffects.
Nichola Burton, Linda Jeffery, Jack Bonner, Gillian Rhodes. J Vis 2016
9
100

The timecourse of higher-level face aftereffects.
Gillian Rhodes, Linda Jeffery, Colin W G Clifford, David A Leopold. Vision Res 2007
71
100

The distributed human neural system for face perception.
Haxby, Hoffman, Gobbini. Trends Cogn Sci 2000
66

Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects.
D A Leopold, A J O'Toole, T Vetter, V Blanz. Nat Neurosci 2001
544
66

Fitting the mind to the world: face adaptation and attractiveness aftereffects.
Gillian Rhodes, Linda Jeffery, Tamara L Watson, Colin W G Clifford, Ken Nakayama. Psychol Sci 2003
243
66

Adaptation to natural facial categories.
Michael A Webster, Daniel Kaping, Yoko Mizokami, Paul Duhamel. Nature 2004
408
66

Visual adaptation and face perception.
Michael A Webster, Donald I A MacLeod. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2011
184
66



Simultaneous perceptual and response biases on sequential face attractiveness judgments.
Teresa K Pegors, Marcelo G Mattar, Peter B Bryan, Russell A Epstein. J Exp Psychol Gen 2015
24
66



Mixed emotions: Sensitivity to facial variance in a crowd of faces.
Jason Haberman, Pegan Lee, David Whitney. J Vis 2015
22
33

Effects of face feature and contour crowding in facial expression adaptation.
Pan Liu, Leila Montaser-Kouhsari, Hong Xu. Vision Res 2014
6
33

Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication.
James V Haxby, Elizabeth A Hoffman, M Ida Gobbini. Biol Psychiatry 2002
719
33

Factors governing the speed of color adaptation in foveal versus peripheral vision.
Romain Bachy, Qasim Zaidi. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2014
15
33

Distributed circuits, not circumscribed centers, mediate visual recognition.
Marlene Behrmann, David C Plaut. Trends Cogn Sci 2013
162
33

Adaptive norm-based coding of facial identity.
Gillian Rhodes, Linda Jeffery. Vision Res 2006
184
33

Face inversion increases attractiveness.
Helmut Leder, Juergen Goller, Michael Forster, Lena Schlageter, Matthew A Paul. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2017
6
33



The neural network for face recognition: Insights from an fMRI study on developmental prosopagnosia.
Yuanfang Zhao, Zonglei Zhen, Xiqin Liu, Yiying Song, Jia Liu. Neuroimage 2018
16
33

Seeing the mean: ensemble coding for sets of faces.
Jason Haberman, David Whitney. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2009
167
33

Rapid extraction of mean emotion and gender from sets of faces.
Jason Haberman, David Whitney. Curr Biol 2007
213
33

Averaging facial expression over time.
Jason Haberman, Tom Harp, David Whitney. J Vis 2009
89
33

A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing.
Brad Duchaine, Galit Yovel. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2015
175
33

Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Axel Buchner, Albert-Georg Lang. Behav Res Methods 2009
33

Impaired processing of facial happiness, with or without awareness, in developmental prosopagnosia.
Edwin J Burns, Joel Martin, Alice H D Chan, Hong Xu. Neuropsychologia 2017
13
33

Stages of processing in face perception: an MEG study.
Jia Liu, Alison Harris, Nancy Kanwisher. Nat Neurosci 2002
433
33


The whole is greater than the sum of the parts: Distributed circuits in visual cognition.
Paolo Bartolomeo, Patrik Vuilleumier, Marlene Behrmann. Cortex 2015
5
33

Repeated Measures Correlation.
Jonathan Z Bakdash, Laura R Marusich. Front Psychol 2017
403
33

Dissociating averageness and attractiveness: attractive faces are not always average.
Lisa M DeBruine, Benedict C Jones, Layla Unger, Anthony C Little, David R Feinberg. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2007
45
33

Controlling low-level image properties: the SHINE toolbox.
Verena Willenbockel, Javid Sadr, Daniel Fiset, Greg O Horne, Frédéric Gosselin, James W Tanaka. Behav Res Methods 2010
465
33


Understanding person perception.
Andrew W Young, Vicki Bruce. Br J Psychol 2011
79
33

Ensemble statistics shape face adaptation and the cheerleader effect.
Haojiang Ying, Edwin Burns, Xinyi Lin, Hong Xu. J Exp Psychol Gen 2019
14
33

The fusiform face area: a cortical region specialized for the perception of faces.
Nancy Kanwisher, Galit Yovel. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2006
816
33

A computational theory of human stereo vision.
D Marr, T Poggio. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1979
503
33

Beauty in a smile: the role of medial orbitofrontal cortex in facial attractiveness.
J O'Doherty, J Winston, H Critchley, D Perrett, D M Burt, R J Dolan. Neuropsychologia 2003
493
33

Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness.
D I Perrett, K A May, S Yoshikawa. Nature 1994
334
33


The fusiform face area subserves face perception, not generic within-category identification.
Kalanit Grill-Spector, Nicholas Knouf, Nancy Kanwisher. Nat Neurosci 2004
610
33

Individual differences in ensemble perception reveal multiple, independent levels of ensemble representation.
Jason Haberman, Timothy F Brady, George A Alvarez. J Exp Psychol Gen 2015
63
33

Contextual influence on the tilt after-effect in foveal and para-foveal vision.
Cheng Chen, Xianghui Chen, Min Gao, Qiong Yang, Hongmei Yan. Neurosci Bull 2015
6
33

Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces.
M Ida Gobbini, James V Haxby. Neuropsychologia 2007
505
33


Foveal input is not required for perception of crowd facial expression.
Benjamin A Wolfe, Anna A Kosovicheva, Allison Yamanashi Leib, Katherine Wood, David Whitney. J Vis 2015
18
33

The fusiform "face area" is part of a network that processes faces at the individual level.
I Gauthier, M J Tarr, J Moylan, P Skudlarski, J C Gore, A W Anderson. J Cogn Neurosci 2000
572
33

Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis.
Jeffrey N Rouder, Paul L Speckman, Dongchu Sun, Richard D Morey, Geoffrey Iverson. Psychon Bull Rev 2009
33


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.