A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Arvind Iyer, Johannes Burge. J Vis 2019
Times Cited: 4







List of co-cited articles
49 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.
E H Adelson, J R Bergen. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
75

Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
57
75


Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes.
Stephen Sebastian, Jared Abrams, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017
16
75

An image-computable psychophysical spatial vision model.
Heiko H Schütt, Felix A Wichmann. J Vis 2017
13
75



Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2014
46
75

Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.
Stephen Sebastian, Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2015
17
75

Normalization as a canonical neural computation.
Matteo Carandini, David J Heeger. Nat Rev Neurosci 2011
767
75



Estimating 3D tilt from local image cues in natural scenes.
Johannes Burge, Brian C McCann, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2016
15
75



Motion illusions as optimal percepts.
Yair Weiss, Eero P Simoncelli, Edward H Adelson. Nat Neurosci 2002
512
75

Perceiving visual expansion without optic flow.
P R Schrater, D C Knill, E P Simoncelli. Nature 2001
26
50

The statistics of local motion signals in naturalistic movies.
Eyal I Nitzany, Jonathan D Victor. J Vis 2014
20
50

Contour statistics in natural images: grouping across occlusions.
Wilson S Geisler, Jeffrey S Perry. Vis Neurosci 2009
70
50


Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.
A E Burgess, R F Wagner, R J Jennings, H B Barlow. Science 1981
312
50

The Southampton-York Natural Scenes (SYNS) dataset: Statistics of surface attitude.
Wendy J Adams, James H Elder, Erich W Graf, Julian Leyland, Arthur J Lugtigheid, Alexander Muryy. Sci Rep 2016
23
50


Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.
Johannes Burge, Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro. Curr Biol 2019
10
50


Visual signal detection. IV. Observer inconsistency.
A E Burgess, B Colborne. J Opt Soc Am A 1988
201
50


Signal Integration in Human Visual Speed Perception.
Matjaž Jogan, Alan A Stocker. J Neurosci 2015
17
50



A Normalization Mechanism for Estimating Visual Motion across Speeds and Scales.
Nikos Gekas, Andrew I Meso, Guillaume S Masson, Pascal Mamassian. Curr Biol 2017
8
50


A model of neuronal responses in visual area MT.
E P Simoncelli, D J Heeger. Vision Res 1998
468
50

Decision-variable correlation.
Stephen Sebastian, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2018
8
50


Optimal stimulus encoders for natural tasks.
Wilson S Geisler, Jiri Najemnik, Almon D Ing. J Vis 2009
37
50

The physical limits of grating visibility.
M S Banks, W S Geisler, P J Bennett. Vision Res 1987
138
50

Measurement and modeling of depth cue combination: in defense of weak fusion.
M S Landy, L T Maloney, E B Johnston, M Young. Vision Res 1995
563
50



Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
100
50

Depth variation and stereo processing tasks in natural scenes.
Arvind V Iyer, Johannes Burge. J Vis 2018
4
50

"What Not" Detectors Help the Brain See in Depth.
Nuno R Goncalves, Andrew E Welchman. Curr Biol 2017
35
50


Cardinal rules: visual orientation perception reflects knowledge of environmental statistics.
Ahna R Girshick, Michael S Landy, Eero P Simoncelli. Nat Neurosci 2011
245
50

Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields.
Nicole C Rust, Odelia Schwartz, J Anthony Movshon, Eero P Simoncelli. Neuron 2005
265
50

Representation of concurrent stimuli by population activity in visual cortex.
Laura Busse, Alex R Wade, Matteo Carandini. Neuron 2009
124
50


Flexible gating of contextual influences in natural vision.
Ruben Coen-Cagli, Adam Kohn, Odelia Schwartz. Nat Neurosci 2015
67
50



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.