A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Iris M Bakkeren, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Eline M Bunnik, Attie T J I Go, Aad Tibben, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Sam R Riedijk. J Genet Couns 2020
Times Cited: 1

List of co-cited articles
articles co-cited >1

Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited

Attitudes of pregnant women and male partners towards non-invasive prenatal testing and widening the scope of prenatal screening.
Rachèl V van Schendel, Johanna H Kleinveld, Wybo J Dondorp, Eva Pajkrt, Danielle R M Timmermans, Kim C A Holtkamp, Margreet Karsten, Anne L Vlietstra, Augusta M A Lachmeijer, Lidewij Henneman. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014

Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.
Wybo Dondorp, Guido de Wert, Yvonne Bombard, Diana W Bianchi, Carsten Bergmann, Pascal Borry, Lyn S Chitty, Florence Fellmann, Francesca Forzano, Alison Hall,[...]. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2015

Social influence and the collective dynamics of opinion formation.
Mehdi Moussaïd, Juliane E Kämmer, Pantelis P Analytis, Hansjörg Neth. PLoS ONE 2013

People who influence women's decisions and preferred sources of information about prenatal testing for birth defects.
Alice M Jaques, Robin J Bell, Lyndsey Watson, Jane L Halliday. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2004

Ethics of routine: a critical analysis of the concept of 'routinisation' in prenatal screening.
Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Inez D de Beaufort, Robert-Jan H Galjaard, Eline M Bunnik. J Med Ethics 2018

Attitudes of mothers of children with down syndrome towards noninvasive prenatal testing.
Gregory Kellogg, Leah Slattery, Louanne Hudgins, Kelly Ormond. J Genet Couns 2014

The value of non-invasive prenatal testing: preferences of Canadian pregnant women, their partners, and health professionals regarding NIPT use and access.
Stanislav Birko, Vardit Ravitsky, Charles Dupras, Jessica Le Clerc-Blain, Marie-Eve Lemoine, Aliya O Affdal, Hazar Haidar, Anne-Marie Laberge. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019

Trial by Dutch laboratories for evaluation of non-invasive prenatal testing. Part I-clinical impact.
Dick Oepkes, G C Lieve Page-Christiaens, Caroline J Bax, Mireille N Bekker, Catia M Bilardo, Elles M J Boon, G Heleen Schuring-Blom, Audrey B C Coumans, Brigitte H Faas, Robert-Jan H Galjaard,[...]. Prenat. Diagn. 2016

Determinants of first trimester combined test participation within the central region of the Netherlands.
Neeltje M T H Crombag, Peter C J I Schielen, Chantal W Hukkelhoven, Rita Iedema, Jozien M Bensing, Gerard H A Visser, Philip Stoutenbeek, Maria P H Koster. Prenat. Diagn. 2015

Rethinking autonomy in the context of prenatal screening decision-making.
Elisa García, Danielle R M Timmermans, Evert van Leeuwen. Prenat. Diagn. 2008

Supporting Women's Autonomy in Prenatal Testing.
Josephine Johnston, Ruth M Farrell, Erik Parens. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017

Non-invasive prenatal testing for single gene disorders: exploring the ethics.
Zuzana Deans, Melissa Hill, Lyn S Chitty, Celine Lewis. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013

Our children are not a diagnosis: the experience of parents who continue their pregnancy after a prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 13 or 18.
Jennifer Guon, Benjamin S Wilfond, Barbara Farlow, Tracy Brazg, Annie Janvier. Am. J. Med. Genet. A 2014

What Do Parents of Children with Down Syndrome Think about Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT)?
Rachèl V van Schendel, Adriana Kater-Kuipers, Elsbeth H van Vliet-Lachotzki, Wybo J Dondorp, Martina C Cornel, Lidewij Henneman. J Genet Couns 2017

Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.