A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Wendie A Berg, Jeremy M Berg, Edward A Sickles, Elizabeth S Burnside, Margarita L Zuley, Robert D Rosenberg, Cindy S Lee. Radiology 2020
Times Cited: 14







List of co-cited articles
45 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity



Use of BI-RADS 3-probably benign category in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial.
Janet K Baum, Lucy G Hanna, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Mary C Mahoney, Emily F Conant, Lawrence W Bassett, Etta D Pisano. Radiology 2011
48
28

The National Mammography Database: Preliminary Data.
Cindy S Lee, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Elizabeth S Burnside, Paul Nagy, Edward A Sickles. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016
50
28

Revisiting the mammographic follow-up of BI-RADS category 3 lesions.
Ximena Varas, José H Leborgne, Francisco Leborgne, Julieta Mezzera, Sylvia Jaumandreu, Felix Leborgne. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002
127
28

Short-term follow-up results in 795 nonpalpable probably benign lesions detected at screening mammography.
I Vizcaíno, L Gadea, L Andreo, D Salas, F Ruiz-Perales, D Cuevas, C Herranz, F Bueno. Radiology 2001
128
28

Breast cancer yield for screening mammographic examinations with recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Karla Kerlikowske, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Linn A Abraham, Constance D Lehman, Bonnie C Yankaskas, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, William E Barlow, Jennifer H Voeks, Berta M Geller, Patricia A Carney,[...]. Radiology 2005
45
21

Growing BI-RADS category 3 lesions on follow-up breast ultrasound: malignancy rates and worrisome features.
Su Min Ha, Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hee Jung Shin, Woo Jung Choi, Hak Hee Kim. Br J Radiol 2018
4
75


Surveillance of probably benign (BI-RADS 3) lesions in mammography: what is the right follow-up protocol?
Karen A Buch, Muhammad M Qureshi, Bianca Carpentier, Deborah A Cunningham, Michael Stone, Carl Jaffe, Marie Quinn, Carlos Gonzalez, Justine LaVoye, Neely Hines,[...]. Breast J 2015
6
50

Nonpalpable, probably benign lesions: role of follow-up mammography.
X Varas, F Leborgne, J H Leborgne. Radiology 1992
178
21

Mammographic follow-up of low-suspicion lesions: compliance rate and diagnostic yield.
M A Helvie, D R Pennes, M Rebner, D D Adler. Radiology 1991
126
21


Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.
Wendie A Berg, Alan G Sechtin, Helga Marques, Zheng Zhang. Radiol Clin North Am 2010
72
21

Patient compliance and diagnostic yield of 18-month unilateral follow-up in surveillance of probably benign mammographic lesions.
Chris Sungwon Chung, Catherine S Giess, Eva C Gombos, Elisabeth P Frost, Eren D Yeh, Sughra Raza, Robyn L Birdwell. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014
24
21

Variability in Individual Radiologist BI-RADS 3 Usage at a Large Academic Center: What's the Cause and What Should We Do About It?
Emily B Ambinder, Lisa A Mullen, Eniola Falomo, Kelly Myers, Jessica Hung, Bonmyong Lee, Susan C Harvey. Acad Radiol 2019
5
60

Recommendation for short-interval follow-up examinations after a probably benign assessment: is clinical practice consistent with BI-RADS guidance?
Erin J Aiello Bowles, Edward A Sickles, Diana L Miglioretti, Patricia A Carney, Joann G Elmore. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010
11
18

A Pictorial Review of Changes in the BI-RADS Fifth Edition.
Ajay Aroor Rao, Jennifer Feneis, Chloe Lalonde, Haydee Ojeda-Fournier. Radiographics 2016
92
14

Shear-wave elastography improves the specificity of breast US: the BE1 multinational study of 939 masses.
Wendie A Berg, David O Cosgrove, Caroline J Doré, Fritz K W Schäfer, William E Svensson, Regina J Hooley, Ralf Ohlinger, Ellen B Mendelson, Catherine Balu-Maestro, Martina Locatelli,[...]. Radiology 2012
517
14

Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
Wendie A Berg, Jeffrey D Blume, Jean B Cormack, Ellen B Mendelson, Daniel Lehrer, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Etta D Pisano, Roberta A Jong, W Phil Evans, Marilyn J Morton,[...]. JAMA 2008
856
14

Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Wendie A Berg, Zheng Zhang, Daniel Lehrer, Roberta A Jong, Etta D Pisano, Richard G Barr, Marcela Böhm-Vélez, Mary C Mahoney, W Phil Evans, Linda H Larsen,[...]. JAMA 2012
621
14

Assessment and Management of Challenging BI-RADS Category 3 Mammographic Lesions.
Aya Y Michaels, Robyn L Birdwell, Chris SungWon Chung, Elisabeth P Frost, Catherine S Giess. Radiographics 2016
10
20

Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography.
Edward A Sickles, Diana L Miglioretti, Rachel Ballard-Barbash, Berta M Geller, Jessica W T Leung, Robert D Rosenberg, Rebecca Smith-Bindman, Bonnie C Yankaskas. Radiology 2005
142
14

BI-RADS 3: Current and Future Use of Probably Benign.
Karen A Lee, Nishi Talati, Rebecca Oudsema, Sharon Steinberger, Laurie R Margolies. Curr Radiol Rep 2018
28
14

National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
Constance D Lehman, Robert F Arao, Brian L Sprague, Janie M Lee, Diana S M Buist, Karla Kerlikowske, Louise M Henderson, Tracy Onega, Anna N A Tosteson, Garth H Rauscher,[...]. Radiology 2017
243
14


Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hee Jung Shin, Woo Jung Choi, Hak Hee Kim. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2016
25
14



Patient Compliance in the Setting of BI-RADS Category 3: What Factors Impact Compliance With Short-Term Follow-Up Recommendations?
Marisa H Borders, Lucy Cheng, Kimberly A Fitzpatrick, Elizabeth A Krupinski. Breast J 2017
9
22

Palpable breast masses with probably benign morphology at sonography: can biopsy be deferred?
Y-M Park, E-K Kim, J-H Lee, J-H Ryu, S-S Han, S-J Choi, S-J Lee, H-K Yoon. Acta Radiol 2008
44
14

Patient Perceptions of Breast Cancer Risk in Imaging-Detected Low-Risk Scenarios and Thresholds for Desired Intervention: A Multi-Institution Survey.
Lars J Grimm, Rebecca A Shelby, Emily E Knippa, Eun L Langman, Lauren S Miller, Beth E Whiteside, Mary Scott C Soo. J Am Coll Radiol 2018
7
28

Association of Patient Age With Outcomes of Current-Era, Large-Scale Screening Mammography: Analysis of Data From the National Mammography Database.
Cindy S Lee, Debapriya Sengupta, Mythreyi Bhargavan-Chatfield, Edward A Sickles, Elizabeth S Burnside, Margarita L Zuley. JAMA Oncol 2017
26
14

Tomosynthesis in the Diagnostic Setting: Changing Rates of BI-RADS Final Assessment over Time.
Madhavi Raghu, Melissa A Durand, Liva Andrejeva, Alexander Goehler, Mark H Michalski, Jaime L Geisel, Regina J Hooley, Laura J Horvath, Reni Butler, Howard P Forman,[...]. Radiology 2016
34
14

Harmonizing Breast Cancer Screening Recommendations: Metrics and Accountability.
Cindy S Lee, Linda Moy, Sarah M Friedewald, Edward A Sickles, Debra L Monticciolo. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2018
15
14

BI-RADS Category 3 Comparison: Probably Benign Category after Recall from Screening before and after Implementation of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
Elizabeth S McDonald, Anne Marie McCarthy, Susan P Weinstein, Mitchell D Schnall, Emily F Conant. Radiology 2017
14
14

Frequency and predictive value of a mammographic recommendation for short-interval follow-up.
Shagufta Yasmeen, Patrick S Romano, Mary Pettinger, Rowan T Chlebowski, John A Robbins, Dorothy S Lane, Susan L Hendrix. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003
60
14

Probably benign breast masses at US: is follow-up an acceptable alternative to biopsy?
Oswald Graf, Thomas H Helbich, Gottfried Hopf, Claudia Graf, Edward A Sickles. Radiology 2007
100
14

Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy?
Caroline P Daly, Janet E Bailey, Katherine A Klein, Mark A Helvie. Acad Radiol 2008
32
14

Multiple bilateral circumscribed masses at screening breast US: consider annual follow-up.
Wendie A Berg, Zheng Zhang, Jean B Cormack, Ellen B Mendelson. Radiology 2013
38
14

Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41.
Regina J Hooley, Kathryn L Greenberg, Rebecca M Stackhouse, Jaime L Geisel, Reni S Butler, Liane E Philpotts. Radiology 2012
267
14


Undiagnosed Breast Cancer: Features at Supplemental Screening US.
Sung Eun Song, Nariya Cho, Ajung Chu, Sung Ui Shin, Ann Yi, Su Hyun Lee, Won Hwa Kim, Min Sun Bae, Woo Kyung Moon. Radiology 2015
19
14


Imaging and Histopathologic Features of BI-RADS 3 Lesions Upgraded during Imaging Surveillance.
Aya Michaels, Chris SungWon Chung, Robyn L Birdwell, Elisabeth P Frost, Catherine S Giess. Breast J 2017
9
22

Interobserver variability in upgraded and non-upgraded BI-RADS 3 lesions.
A Y Michaels, C S W Chung, E P Frost, R L Birdwell, C S Giess. Clin Radiol 2017
11
18

Correlation of Chest CT and RT-PCR Testing for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: A Report of 1014 Cases.
Tao Ai, Zhenlu Yang, Hongyan Hou, Chenao Zhan, Chong Chen, Wenzhi Lv, Qian Tao, Ziyong Sun, Liming Xia. Radiology 2020
7

Essentials for Radiologists on COVID-19: An Update-Radiology Scientific Expert Panel.
Jeffrey P Kanne, Brent P Little, Jonathan H Chung, Brett M Elicker, Loren H Ketai. Radiology 2020
359
7


Harms of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
Heidi D Nelson, Miranda Pappas, Amy Cantor, Jessica Griffin, Monica Daeges, Linda Humphrey. Ann Intern Med 2016
220
7



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.