A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


The capacity of audiovisual integration is limited to one item.
Erik Van der Burg, Edward Awh, Christian N L Olivers. Psychol Sci 2013
33
100

Binding and unbinding the auditory and visual streams in the McGurk effect.
Olha Nahorna, Frédéric Berthommier, Jean-Luc Schwartz. J Acoust Soc Am 2012
43
100

Attention and the multiple stages of multisensory integration: A review of audiovisual studies.
Thomas Koelewijn, Adelbert Bronkhorst, Jan Theeuwes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2010
147
100


Hearing lips and seeing voices.
H McGurk, J MacDonald. Nature 1976
100

Visual illusion induced by sound.
Ladan Shams, Yukiyasu Kamitani, Shinsuke Shimojo. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2002
313
100

What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?
Violet A Brown, Maryam Hedayati, Annie Zanger, Sasha Mayn, Lucia Ray, Naseem Dillman-Hasso, Julia F Strand. PLoS One 2018
17
100

Relationship between visual and tactile representations in cat superior colliculus.
B E Stein, B Magalhães-Castro, L Kruger. J Neurophysiol 1976
289
100

Audiovisual integration capacity modulates as a function of illusory visual contours, visual display circumference, and sound type.
Jonathan M P Wilbiks, Antonina D S Pavilanis, Dominic M Rioux. Atten Percept Psychophys 2020
3
100



Audiovisual integration in depth: multisensory binding and gain as a function of distance.
Jean-Paul Noel, Kahan Modi, Mark T Wallace, Nathan Van der Stoep. Exp Brain Res 2018
14
100


Forty Years After Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices: the McGurk Effect Revisited.
Agnès Alsius, Martin Paré, Kevin G Munhall. Multisens Res 2018
37
100

Variability and stability in the McGurk effect: contributions of participants, stimuli, time, and response type.
Debshila Basu Mallick, John F Magnotti, Michael S Beauchamp. Psychon Bull Rev 2015
69
100


Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus.
Michael S Beauchamp, Kathryn E Lee, Brenna D Argall, Alex Martin. Neuron 2004
498
100

Audiovisual sentence recognition not predicted by susceptibility to the McGurk effect.
Kristin J Van Engen, Zilong Xie, Bharath Chandrasekaran. Atten Percept Psychophys 2017
23
100

A link between individual differences in multisensory speech perception and eye movements.
Demet Gurler, Nathan Doyle, Edgar Walker, John Magnotti, Michael Beauchamp. Atten Percept Psychophys 2015
36
100

Individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect: links with lipreading and detecting audiovisual incongruity.
Julia Strand, Allison Cooperman, Jonathon Rowe, Andrea Simenstad. J Speech Lang Hear Res 2014
28
100

Lipreading and audiovisual speech recognition across the adult lifespan: Implications for audiovisual integration.
Nancy Tye-Murray, Brent Spehar, Joel Myerson, Sandra Hale, Mitchell Sommers. Psychol Aging 2016
40
100


Pip and pop: nonspatial auditory signals improve spatial visual search.
Erik Van der Burg, Christian N L Olivers, Adelbert W Bronkhorst, Jan Theeuwes. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2008
249
100

Prestimulus beta power and phase synchrony influence the sound-induced flash illusion.
Julian Keil, Nadia Müller, Thomas Hartmann, Nathan Weisz. Cereb Cortex 2014
59
100

Multisensory integration: current issues from the perspective of the single neuron.
Barry E Stein, Terrence R Stanford. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008
786
100

Illusions. What you see is what you hear.
L Shams, Y Kamitani, S Shimojo. Nature 2000
621
100




The sound-induced flash illusion reveals dissociable age-related effects in multisensory integration.
David P McGovern, Eugenie Roudaia, John Stapleton, T Martin McGinnity, Fiona N Newell. Front Aging Neurosci 2014
61
100


"Paying" attention to audiovisual speech: Do incongruent stimuli incur greater costs?
Violet A Brown, Julia F Strand. Atten Percept Psychophys 2019
2
100





Individual differences in the multisensory temporal binding window predict susceptibility to audiovisual illusions.
Ryan A Stevenson, Raquel K Zemtsov, Mark T Wallace. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2012
165
100

The contribution of perceptual factors and training on varying audiovisual integration capacity.
Jonathan M P Wilbiks, Benjamin J Dyson. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2018
6
100



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.