A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
14 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity




Constrained sampling experiments reveal principles of detection in natural scenes.
Stephen Sebastian, Jared Abrams, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017
16
100

Optimal disparity estimation in natural stereo images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2014
47
100

Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations.
Pablo Artal, Li Chen, Enrique J Fernández, Ben Singer, Silvestre Manzanera, David R Williams. J Vis 2004
194
100


Optimal defocus estimation in individual natural images.
Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
57
100

An image-computable psychophysical spatial vision model.
Heiko H Schütt, Felix A Wichmann. J Vis 2017
13
100


Monovision and the Misperception of Motion.
Johannes Burge, Victor Rodriguez-Lopez, Carlos Dorronsoro. Curr Biol 2019
11
100

Defocus blur discrimination in natural images with natural optics.
Stephen Sebastian, Johannes Burge, Wilson S Geisler. J Vis 2015
18
100



Optimal stimulus encoders for natural tasks.
Wilson S Geisler, Jiri Najemnik, Almon D Ing. J Vis 2009
37
100


Perceiving visual expansion without optic flow.
P R Schrater, D C Knill, E P Simoncelli. Nature 2001
26
50

The statistics of local motion signals in naturalistic movies.
Eyal I Nitzany, Jonathan D Victor. J Vis 2014
20
50


Cuttlefish use stereopsis to strike at prey.
R C Feord, M E Sumner, S Pusdekar, L Kalra, P T Gonzalez-Bellido, Trevor J Wardill. Sci Adv 2020
11
50


Chromatic aberration and ocular focus: Fincham revisited.
P B Kruger, S Mathews, K R Aggarwala, N Sanchez. Vision Res 1993
79
50

Spatiotemporal elements of macaque v1 receptive fields.
Nicole C Rust, Odelia Schwartz, J Anthony Movshon, Eero P Simoncelli. Neuron 2005
265
50

Disparity tuning in mechanisms of human stereopsis.
S B Stevenson, L K Cormack, C M Schor, C W Tyler. Vision Res 1992
58
50

The physiology of stereopsis.
B G Cumming, G C DeAngelis. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
244
50

Efficiency of human visual signal discrimination.
A E Burgess, R F Wagner, R J Jennings, H B Barlow. Science 1981
312
50

Foveal blur discrimination of the human eye.
Bin Wang, Kenneth J Ciuffreda. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005
26
50

Physical limits of acuity and hyperacuity.
W S Geisler. J Opt Soc Am A 1984
110
50

A far-sighted view of myopia.
C F Wildsoet, R O Wong. Nat Med 1999
6
50


Strong percepts of motion through depth without strong percepts of position in depth.
Bas Rokers, Lawrence K Cormack, Alexander C Huk. J Vis 2008
30
50


Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues.
J M Harris, S N Watamaniuk. Vision Res 1995
74
50

Orientational selectivity of the human visual system.
F W Campbell, J J Kulikowski. J Physiol 1966
428
50

The Human Brain in Depth: How We See in 3D.
Andrew E Welchman. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2016
30
50

Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
100
50

Depth perception from image defocus in a jumping spider.
Takashi Nagata, Mitsumasa Koyanagi, Hisao Tsukamoto, Shinjiro Saeki, Kunio Isono, Yoshinori Shichida, Fumio Tokunaga, Michiyo Kinoshita, Kentaro Arikawa, Akihisa Terakita. Science 2012
55
50


Accommodation without feedback suggests directional signals specify ocular focus.
P B Kruger, S Mathews, M Katz, K R Aggarwala, S Nowbotsing. Vision Res 1997
48
50



Signal Integration in Human Visual Speed Perception.
Matjaž Jogan, Alan A Stocker. J Neurosci 2015
17
50



Binocular integration and disparity selectivity in mouse primary visual cortex.
Benjamin Scholl, Johannes Burge, Nicholas J Priebe. J Neurophysiol 2013
49
50

The imprecision of stereopsis.
S P McKee, D M Levi, S F Bowne. Vision Res 1990
126
50


Binocular Mechanisms of 3D Motion Processing.
Lawrence K Cormack, Thaddeus B Czuba, Jonas Knöll, Alexander C Huk. Annu Rev Vis Sci 2017
11
50


Contrast discrimination in noise.
G E Legge, D Kersten, A E Burgess. J Opt Soc Am A 1987
208
50



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.