A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Christin Hoell, Julia Wynn, Luke V Rasmussen, Keith Marsolo, Sharon A Aufox, Wendy K Chung, John J Connolly, Robert R Freimuth, David Kochan, Hakon Hakonarson, Margaret Harr, Ingrid A Holm, Iftikhar J Kullo, Philip E Lammers, Kathleen A Leppig, Nancy D Leslie, Melanie F Myers, Richard R Sharp, Maureen E Smith, Cynthia A Prows. Genet Med 2020
Times Cited: 7







List of co-cited articles
25 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


ACMG recommendations for reporting of incidental findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing.
Robert C Green, Jonathan S Berg, Wayne W Grody, Sarah S Kalia, Bruce R Korf, Christa L Martin, Amy L McGuire, Robert L Nussbaum, Julianne M O'Daniel, Kelly E Ormond,[...]. Genet Med 2013
42



Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network.
John A Lynch, Richard R Sharp, Sharon A Aufox, Sarah T Bland, Carrie Blout, Deborah J Bowen, Adam H Buchanan, Colin Halverson, Margaret Harr, Scott J Hebbring,[...]. J Pers Med 2020
2
100

Return of Value in the New Era of Biomedical Research-One Size Will Not Fit All.
Dmitry Khodyakov, Alexandra Mendoza-Graf, Sandra Berry, Camille Nebeker, Elizabeth Bromley. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
7
28

Public perspectives on returning genetics and genomics research results.
J O'Daniel, S B Haga. Public Health Genomics 2011
57
28

Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.
Gail P Jarvik, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Kyle Brothers, Ellen W Clayton, Wendy Chung, Barbara J Evans, James P Evans, Stephanie M Fullerton, Carlos J Gallego,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 2014
241
28

Intentions to receive individual results from whole-genome sequencing among participants in the ClinSeq study.
Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
124
28

Subjects matter: a survey of public opinions about a large genetic cohort study.
David Kaufman, Juli Murphy, Joan Scott, Kathy Hudson. Genet Med 2008
159
28

Attitudes of nearly 7000 health professionals, genomic researchers and publics toward the return of incidental results from sequencing research.
Anna Middleton, Katherine I Morley, Eugene Bragin, Helen V Firth, Matthew E Hurles, Caroline F Wright, Michael Parker. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
112
28

Institutional review board perspectives on obligations to disclose genetic incidental findings to research participants.
Catherine Gliwa, Ilana R Yurkiewicz, Lisa Soleymani Lehmann, Sara Chandros Hull, Nathan Jones, Benjamin E Berkman. Genet Med 2016
16
28

Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.
Martha F Wright, Katie L Lewis, Tyler C Fisher, Gillian W Hooker, Toby E Emanuel, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Genet Med 2014
45
28

Research Participants' Preferences for Hypothetical Secondary Results from Genomic Research.
Julia Wynn, Josue Martinez, Jimmy Duong, Codruta Chiuzan, Jo C Phelan, Abby Fyer, Robert L Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Wendy K Chung. J Genet Couns 2017
24
28

A randomized controlled trial of disclosing genetic risk information for Alzheimer disease via telephone.
Kurt D Christensen, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Erin Linnenbringer, Peter J Whitehouse, Charmaine D M Royal, Thomas O Obisesan, L Adrienne Cupples, Melissa B Butson, Grace-Ann Fasaye,[...]. Genet Med 2018
26
28

Secondary findings from clinical genomic sequencing: prevalence, patient perspectives, family history assessment, and health-care costs from a multisite study.
M Ragan Hart, Barbara B Biesecker, Carrie L Blout, Kurt D Christensen, Laura M Amendola, Katie L Bergstrom, Sawona Biswas, Kevin M Bowling, Kyle B Brothers, Laura K Conlin,[...]. Genet Med 2019
58
28

Recommendations for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing, 2016 update (ACMG SF v2.0): a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.
Sarah S Kalia, Kathy Adelman, Sherri J Bale, Wendy K Chung, Christine Eng, James P Evans, Gail E Herman, Sophia B Hufnagel, Teri E Klein, Bruce R Korf,[...]. Genet Med 2017
842
28

Experiences and attitudes of genome investigators regarding return of individual genetic test results.
Rachel B Ramoni, Amy L McGuire, Jill Oliver Robinson, Debra S Morley, Sharon E Plon, Steven Joffe. Genet Med 2013
39
28

Return of individual genomic research results: are laws and policies keeping step?
Adrian Thorogood, Gratien Dalpé, Bartha Maria Knoppers. Eur J Hum Genet 2019
37
28

Disclosure of clinically actionable genetic variants to thoracic aortic dissection biobank participants.
Adelyn Beil, Whitney Hornsby, Wendy R Uhlmann, Rajani Aatre, Patricia Arscott, Brooke Wolford, Kim A Eagle, Bo Yang, Jennifer McNamara, Cristen Willer,[...]. BMC Med Genomics 2021
3
66

Navigating the research-clinical interface in genomic medicine: analysis from the CSER Consortium.
Susan M Wolf, Laura M Amendola, Jonathan S Berg, Wendy K Chung, Ellen Wright Clayton, Robert C Green, Julie Harris-Wai, Gail E Henderson, Gail P Jarvik, Barbara A Koenig,[...]. Genet Med 2018
22
28

Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology.
Sue Richards, Nazneen Aziz, Sherri Bale, David Bick, Soma Das, Julie Gastier-Foster, Wayne W Grody, Madhuri Hegde, Elaine Lyon, Elaine Spector,[...]. Genet Med 2015
28

Researchers' views on return of incidental genomic research results: qualitative and quantitative findings.
Robert Klitzman, Paul S Appelbaum, Abby Fyer, Josue Martinez, Brigitte Buquez, Julia Wynn, Cameron R Waldman, Jo Phelan, Erik Parens, Wendy K Chung. Genet Med 2013
85
28

Genotype-first approach to the detection of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk, and effects of risk disclosure to biobank participants.
Liis Leitsalu, Marili Palover, Timo Tõnis Sikka, Anu Reigo, Mart Kals, Kalle Pärn, Tiit Nikopensius, Tõnu Esko, Andres Metspalu, Peeter Padrik,[...]. Eur J Hum Genet 2021
2
100

Preferences for Return of Genetic Results Among Participants in the Jackson Heart Study and Framingham Heart Study.
Steven Joffe, Deborah E Sellers, Lynette Ekunwe, Donna Antoine-Lavigne, Sarah McGraw, Daniel Levy, Greta Lee Splansky. Circ Genom Precis Med 2019
6
33

A Survey of U.S Adults' Opinions about Conduct of a Nationwide Precision Medicine Initiative® Cohort Study of Genes and Environment.
David J Kaufman, Rebecca Baker, Lauren C Milner, Stephanie Devaney, Kathy L Hudson. PLoS One 2016
55
28

Ethical Considerations Related to Return of Results from Genomic Medicine Projects: The eMERGE Network (Phase III) Experience.
Robyn Fossey, David Kochan, Erin Winkler, Joel E Pacyna, Janet Olson, Stephen Thibodeau, John J Connolly, Margaret Harr, Meckenzie A Behr, Cynthia A Prows,[...]. J Pers Med 2018
25
14

Privacy in the age of medical big data.
W Nicholson Price, I Glenn Cohen. Nat Med 2019
114
14

Prioritizing Approaches to Engage Community Members and Build Trust in Biobanks: A Survey of Attitudes and Opinions of Adults within Outpatient Practices at the University of Maryland.
Casey Lynnette Overby, Kristin A Maloney, Tameka DeShawn Alestock, Justin Chavez, David Berman, Reem Maged Sharaf, Tom Fitzgerald, Eun-Young Kim, Kathleen Palmer, Alan R Shuldiner,[...]. J Pers Med 2015
9
14


Comparison of Sociodemographic and Health-Related Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants With Those of the General Population.
Anna Fry, Thomas J Littlejohns, Cathie Sudlow, Nicola Doherty, Ligia Adamska, Tim Sprosen, Rory Collins, Naomi E Allen. Am J Epidemiol 2017
711
14

Evolving approaches to the ethical management of genomic data.
Jean E McEwen, Joy T Boyer, Kathie Y Sun. Trends Genet 2013
29
14

Informing clinical trial participants about study results.
Ann H Partridge, Eric P Winer. JAMA 2002
120
14

Health research participants' preferences for receiving research results.
Christopher R Long, M Kathryn Stewart, Thomas V Cunningham, T Scott Warmack, Pearl A McElfish. Clin Trials 2016
27
14

Communicating with biobank participants: preferences for receiving and providing updates to researchers.
Jessica L Mester, MaryBeth Mercer, Aaron Goldenberg, Rebekah A Moore, Charis Eng, Richard R Sharp. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2015
9
14

Towards 'Engagement 2.0': Insights from a study of dynamic consent with biobank participants.
Harriet Ja Teare, Michael Morrison, Edgar A Whitley, Jane Kaye. Digit Health 2015
24
14

Offering individual genetic research results: context matters.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke. Sci Transl Med 2010
133
14

Predicting intention to biobank: a national survey.
Christine R Critchley, Dianne Nicol, Margaret F A Otlowski, Mark J A Stranger. Eur J Public Health 2012
46
14



Assessing research participant preferences for receiving study results.
Sarah Cook, Stephanie Mayers, Kathryn Goggins, David Schlundt, Kemberlee Bonnet, Neely Williams, Donald Alcendor, Shari Barkin. J Clin Transl Sci 2019
4
25

Return of Research Results to Study Participants: Uncharted and Untested.
Charlene A Wong, Adrian F Hernandez, Robert M Califf. JAMA 2018
26
14

Biobanks-A Platform for Scientific and Biomedical Research.
Kristina Malsagova, Artur Kopylov, Alexander Stepanov, Tatyana Butkova, Alexandra Sinitsyna, Alexander Izotov, Anna Kaysheva. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020
11
14

Adult patient perspectives on clinical trial result reporting: A survey of cancer patients.
Kate E Elzinga, Omar F Khan, Andrew R Tang, Conrad V Fernandez, Christine L Elzinga, Daniel Yc Heng, Michael M Vickers, Tony H Truong, Patricia A Tang. Clin Trials 2016
8
14

Black-White Differences in Willingness to Participate and Perceptions About Health Research: Results from the Population-Based HealthStreet Study.
Fern J Webb, Jagdish Khubchandani, Catherine Woodstock Striley, Linda B Cottler. J Immigr Minor Health 2019
18
14

What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies.
Courtney L Scherr, Sharon Aufox, Amy A Ross, Sanjana Ramesh, Catherine A Wicklund, Maureen Smith. Healthcare (Basel) 2018
10
14

Revisiting respect for persons in genomic research.
Debra J H Mathews, Leila Jamal. Genes (Basel) 2014
7
14

Offering aggregate results to participants in genomic research: opportunities and challenges.
Laura M Beskow, Wylie Burke, Stephanie M Fullerton, Richard R Sharp. Genet Med 2012
34
14


Communicating with participants during the conduct of multi-center clinical trials.
Erika F Augustine, E Ray Dorsey, Robert A Hauser, Jordan J Elm, Barbara C Tilley, Karl K Kieburtz. Clin Trials 2016
3
33

Qualitative study of participants' perceptions and preferences regarding research dissemination.
Rachel S Purvis, Traci H Abraham, Christopher R Long, M Kathryn Stewart, T Scott Warmack, Pearl Anna McElfish. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2017
19
14


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.