A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
35 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity




Space and Time in the Child's Mind: Evidence for a Cross-Dimensional Asymmetry.
Daniel Casasanto, Olga Fotakopoulou, Lera Boroditsky. Cogn Sci 2010
90
80

Time in the mind: using space to think about time.
Daniel Casasanto, Lera Boroditsky. Cognition 2008
335
80

The parietal cortex and the representation of time, space, number and other magnitudes.
Domenica Bueti, Vincent Walsh. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2009
411
60

G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.
Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder, Albert-Georg Lang, Axel Buchner. Behav Res Methods 2007
60

Interaction of numerosity and time in prefrontal and parietal cortex.
Masamichi J Hayashi, Ryota Kanai, Hiroki C Tanabe, Yumiko Yoshida, Synnöve Carlson, Vincent Walsh, Norihiro Sadato. J Neurosci 2013
71
60

Cross-dimensional magnitude interactions arise from memory interference.
Zhenguang G Cai, Ruiming Wang, Manqiong Shen, Maarten Speekenbrink. Cogn Psychol 2018
14
60


Relativistic compression and expansion of experiential time in the left and right space.
Carmelo Mario Vicario, Patrizia Pecoraro, Patrizia Turriziani, Giacomo Koch, Carlo Caltagirone, Massimiliano Oliveri. PLoS One 2008
107
60

Larger stimuli are judged to last longer.
Bin Xuan, Daren Zhang, Sheng He, Xiangchuan Chen. J Vis 2007
236
60


Temporal context calibrates interval timing.
Mehrdad Jazayeri, Michael N Shadlen. Nat Neurosci 2010
356
40

A Bayesian perspective on magnitude estimation.
Frederike H Petzschner, Stefan Glasauer, Klaas E Stephan. Trends Cogn Sci 2015
128
40


Do monkeys think in metaphors? Representations of space and time in monkeys and humans.
Dustin J Merritt, Daniel Casasanto, Elizabeth M Brannon. Cognition 2010
80
40

Space and time in the child's mind: metaphoric or ATOMic?
Roberto Bottini, Daniel Casasanto. Front Psychol 2013
34
40

Evidence accumulation in the magnitude system.
Anna Lambrechts, Vincent Walsh, Virginie van Wassenhove. PLoS One 2013
34
40




Can Implicit or Explicit Time Processing Impact Numerical Representation? Evidence From a Dual Task Paradigm.
Maria Grazia Di Bono, Caterina Dapor, Simone Cutini, Konstantinos Priftis. Front Psychol 2020
4
50

End effects and cross-dimensional interference in identification of time and length: Evidence for a common memory mechanism.
Jung Aa Moon, Jon M Fincham, Shawn Betts, John R Anderson. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2015
6
40

Cognitive Load Affects Numerical and Temporal Judgments in Distinct Ways.
Karina Hamamouche, Maura Keefe, Kerry E Jordan, Sara Cordes. Front Psychol 2018
8
40

A generalized magnitude system for space, time, and quantity? A cautionary note.
Mark J Yates, Tobias Loetscher, Michael E R Nicholls. J Vis 2012
31
40

On magnitudes in memory: An internal clock account of space-time interaction.
Zhenguang G Cai, Louise Connell. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2016
14
40



Visuospatial working memory influences the interaction between space and time.
Ariel Starr, Elizabeth M Brannon. Psychon Bull Rev 2016
10
40

A new phenomenon in time judgment.
J COHEN, C E HANSEL, J D SYLVESTER. Nature 1953
81
40

Interrelations Between Temporal and Spatial Cognition: The Role of Modality-Specific Processing.
Jonna Loeffler, Rouwen Cañal-Bruland, Anna Schroeger, J Walter Tolentino-Castro, Markus Raab. Front Psychol 2018
8
40

2
100


Adaptation reveals unbalanced interaction between numerosity and time.
Andromachi Tsouli, Serge O Dumoulin, Susan F Te Pas, Maarten J van der Smagt. Cortex 2019
13
40


Absolute travel distance from optic flow.
Harald Frenz, Markus Lappe. Vision Res 2005
54
20

Contracted time and expanded space: The impact of circumnavigation on judgements of space and time.
Iva K Brunec, Amir-Homayoun Javadi, Fiona E L Zisch, Hugo J Spiers. Cognition 2017
18
20

A developmental fMRI study of nonsymbolic numerical and spatial processing.
Liane Kaufmann, Stephan E Vogel, Guilherme Wood, Christian Kremser, Michael Schocke, Lothar-Bernd Zimmerhackl, Jan W Koten. Cortex 2008
75
20

Opposite Effects of Recent History on Perception and Decision.
Matthias Fritsche, Pim Mostert, Floris P de Lange. Curr Biol 2017
152
20


Is navigation in virtual reality with FMRI really navigation?
Jeffrey S Taube, Stephane Valerio, Ryan M Yoder. J Cogn Neurosci 2013
65
20

Blood oxygen level-dependent activation of the primary visual cortex predicts size adaptation illusion.
Arezoo Pooresmaeili, Roberto Arrighi, Laura Biagi, Maria Concetta Morrone. J Neurosci 2013
53
20

Linear mapping of numbers onto space requires attention.
Giovanni Anobile, Guido Marco Cicchini, David C Burr. Cognition 2012
56
20


Traveled distances: new insights into the role of optic flow.
Matteo Mossio, Manuel Vidal, Alain Berthoz. Vision Res 2008
14
20

Near optimal encoding of numerosity in typical and dyscalculic development.
Giovanni Anobile, David C Burr, Filippo Gasperini, Guido Marco Cicchini. Cortex 2019
5
20

Double dissociation of dopamine genes and timing in humans.
Martin Wiener, Falk W Lohoff, H Branch Coslett. J Cogn Neurosci 2011
65
20

Turns during navigation act as boundaries that enhance spatial memory and expand time estimation.
Iva K Brunec, Jason D Ozubko, Tovi Ander, Ruoran Guo, Morris Moscovitch, Morgan D Barense. Neuropsychologia 2020
7
20

Studying human behavior with virtual reality: The Unity Experiment Framework.
Jack Brookes, Matthew Warburton, Mshari Alghadier, Mark Mon-Williams, Faisal Mushtaq. Behav Res Methods 2020
23
20

Independent adaptation mechanisms for numerosity and size perception provide evidence against a common sense of magnitude.
Giovanni Anobile, David C Burr, Marika Iaia, Chiara V Marinelli, Paola Angelelli, Marco Turi. Sci Rep 2018
11
20


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.