C W Tyler. Nature 1974
Times Cited: 136
Times Cited: 136
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Independent stereoscopic channels for different extents of spatial pooling.
R Schumer, L Ganz. Vision Res 1979
R Schumer, L Ganz. Vision Res 1979
39
Similarities between motion parallax and stereopsis in human depth perception.
B Rogers, M Graham. Vision Res 1982
B Rogers, M Graham. Vision Res 1982
27
Why is spatial stereoresolution so low?
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
Martin S Banks, Sergei Gepshtein, Michael S Landy. J Neurosci 2004
26
Stereoscopic depth discrimination in the visual cortex: neurons ideally suited as disparity detectors.
I Ohzawa, G C DeAngelis, R D Freeman. Science 1990
I Ohzawa, G C DeAngelis, R D Freeman. Science 1990
25
28
Sensitivity to horizontal and vertical corrugations defined by binocular disparity.
M F Bradshaw, B J Rogers. Vision Res 1999
M F Bradshaw, B J Rogers. Vision Res 1999
50
Receptive field size in V1 neurons limits acuity for perceiving disparity modulation.
Hendrikje Nienborg, Holly Bridge, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurosci 2004
Hendrikje Nienborg, Holly Bridge, Andrew J Parker, Bruce G Cumming. J Neurosci 2004
25
Selectivity of cyclopean masking for the spatial frequency of binocular disparity modulation.
A B Cobo-Lewis, Y Y Yeh. Vision Res 1994
A B Cobo-Lewis, Y Y Yeh. Vision Res 1994
58
Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold.
H S Smallman, D I MacLeod. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
H S Smallman, D I MacLeod. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 1994
14
14
12
Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings.
F W Campbell, J G Robson. J Physiol 1968
F W Campbell, J G Robson. J Physiol 1968
12
Neural encoding of binocular disparity: energy models, position shifts and phase shifts.
D J Fleet, H Wagner, D J Heeger. Vision Res 1996
D J Fleet, H Wagner, D J Heeger. Vision Res 1996
12
Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception.
B G Cumming, A J Parker. Nature 1997
B G Cumming, A J Parker. Nature 1997
11
Temporal frequency limits for stereoscopic apparent motion processes.
A M Norcia, C W Tyler. Vision Res 1984
A M Norcia, C W Tyler. Vision Res 1984
14
Limits of stereopsis explained by local cross-correlation.
Heather R Filippini, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2009
Heather R Filippini, Martin S Banks. J Vis 2009
20
The neural mechanism of binocular depth discrimination.
H B Barlow, C Blakemore, J D Pettigrew. J Physiol 1967
H B Barlow, C Blakemore, J D Pettigrew. J Physiol 1967
10
Mechanisms underlying the anisotropy of stereoscopic tilt perception.
G J Mitchison, S P McKee. Vision Res 1990
G J Mitchison, S P McKee. Vision Res 1990
17
Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity.
R Cagenello, B J Rogers. Vision Res 1993
R Cagenello, B J Rogers. Vision Res 1993
22
18
Interocular correlation, luminance contrast and cyclopean processing.
L K Cormack, S B Stevenson, C M Schor. Vision Res 1991
L K Cormack, S B Stevenson, C M Schor. Vision Res 1991
10
31
Horizontal and vertical disparity, eye position, and stereoscopic slant perception.
B T Backus, M S Banks, R van Ee, J A Crowell. Vision Res 1999
B T Backus, M S Banks, R van Ee, J A Crowell. Vision Res 1999
9
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.
D G Pelli. Spat Vis 1997
D G Pelli. Spat Vis 1997
9
Range and mechanism of encoding of horizontal disparity in macaque V1.
S J D Prince, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
S J D Prince, B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurophysiol 2002
9
The limits of human stereopsis in space and time.
David Kane, Phillip Guan, Martin S Banks. J Neurosci 2014
David Kane, Phillip Guan, Martin S Banks. J Neurosci 2014
28
Speed discrimination of motion-in-depth using binocular cues.
J M Harris, S N Watamaniuk. Vision Res 1995
J M Harris, S N Watamaniuk. Vision Res 1995
10
PMF: a stereo correspondence algorithm using a disparity gradient limit.
S B Pollard, J E Mayhew, J P Frisby. Perception 1985
S B Pollard, J E Mayhew, J P Frisby. Perception 1985
8
8
Spatiotemporal energy models for the perception of motion.
E H Adelson, J R Bergen. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
E H Adelson, J R Bergen. J Opt Soc Am A 1985
8
Responses of neurons in visual cortex (V1 and V2) of the alert macaque to dynamic random-dot stereograms.
G F Poggio, B C Motter, S Squatrito, Y Trotter. Vision Res 1985
G F Poggio, B C Motter, S Squatrito, Y Trotter. Vision Res 1985
8
Representation of stereoscopic edges in monkey visual cortex.
R von der Heydt, H Zhou, H S Friedman. Vision Res 2000
R von der Heydt, H Zhou, H S Friedman. Vision Res 2000
8
Binocular neurons in V1 of awake monkeys are selective for absolute, not relative, disparity.
B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurosci 1999
B G Cumming, A J Parker. J Neurosci 1999
8
16
Stereo transparency and the disparity gradient limit.
Suzanne P McKee, Preeti Verghese. Vision Res 2002
Suzanne P McKee, Preeti Verghese. Vision Res 2002
30
8
Disparity range for local stereopsis as a function of luminance spatial frequency.
C M Schor, I Wood. Vision Res 1983
C M Schor, I Wood. Vision Res 1983
7
Mechanisms of static and dynamic stereopsis in foveal cortex of the rhesus monkey.
G F Poggio, W H Talbot. J Physiol 1981
G F Poggio, W H Talbot. J Physiol 1981
7
Binocular interaction and depth sensitivity in striate and prestriate cortex of behaving rhesus monkey.
G F Poggio, B Fischer. J Neurophysiol 1977
G F Poggio, B Fischer. J Neurophysiol 1977
7
Disparity scaling and the perception of frontoparallel surfaces.
B J Rogers, M F Bradshaw. Perception 1995
B J Rogers, M F Bradshaw. Perception 1995
7
Spatio-temporal requirements for binocular correlation in stereopsis.
M J Lankheet, P Lennie. Vision Res 1996
M J Lankheet, P Lennie. Vision Res 1996
36
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.