A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

A Borsellino, A De Marco, A Allazetta, S Rinesi, B Bartolini. Kybernetik 1972
Times Cited: 136







List of co-cited articles
638 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Multistable phenomena: changing views in perception.
Leopold, Logothetis. Trends Cogn Sci 1999
461
50

Visual competition.
Randolph Blake, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
814
49

Stable perception of visually ambiguous patterns.
David A Leopold, Melanie Wilke, Alexander Maier, Nikos K Logothetis. Nat Neurosci 2002
267
29


Distributions of alternation rates in various forms of bistable perception.
Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, Wiebe R Pestman, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2005
86
32

Binocular rivalry is not chaotic.
S R Lehky. Proc Biol Sci 1995
88
30

A spiking neuron model for binocular rivalry.
Carlo R Laing, Carson C Chow. J Comput Neurosci 2002
205
26


Computational evidence for a rivalry hierarchy in vision.
Hugh R Wilson. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2003
271
26

Neural correlates of perceptual rivalry in the human brain.
E D Lumer, K J Friston, G Rees. Science 1998
500
25



What is rivalling during binocular rivalry?
N K Logothetis, D A Leopold, D L Sheinberg. Nature 1996
379
24

Perceptual dominance time distributions in multistable visual perception.
Y H Zhou, J B Gao, K D White, I Merk, K Yao. Biol Cybern 2004
58
41




Noise-induced alternations in an attractor network model of perceptual bistability.
Rubén Moreno-Bote, John Rinzel, Nava Rubin. J Neurophysiol 2007
209
22


Discrete stochastic process underlying perceptual rivalry.
Tsutomu Murata, Nobuyuki Matsui, Satoru Miyauchi, Yuki Kakita, Toshio Yanagida. Neuroreport 2003
46
45

Multistability in perception.
F Attneave. Sci Am 1971
174
20

Human brain activity during spontaneously reversing perception of ambiguous figures.
A Kleinschmidt, C Büchel, S Zeki, R S Frackowiak. Proc Biol Sci 1998
208
19


Binocular rivalry and visual awareness in human extrastriate cortex.
F Tong, K Nakayama, J T Vaughan, N Kanwisher. Neuron 1998
526
17



Voluntary control and the dynamics of perceptual bi-stability.
R van Ee, L C J van Dam, G J Brouwer. Vision Res 2005
134
16

The time course of binocular rivalry reveals a fundamental role of noise.
Jan W Brascamp, Raymond van Ee, André J Noest, Richard H A H Jacobs, Albert V van den Berg. J Vis 2006
140
16

The neural bases of multistable perception.
Philipp Sterzer, Andreas Kleinschmidt, Geraint Rees. Trends Cogn Sci 2009
221
16


Stochastic models and fluctuations in reversal time of ambiguous figures.
A De Marco, P Penengo, A Trabucco. Perception 1977
38
39



Neural correlates of spontaneous direction reversals in ambiguous apparent visual motion.
Philipp Sterzer, Michael O Russ, Christine Preibisch, Andreas Kleinschmidt. Neuroimage 2002
95
14



Stochastic resonance in binocular rivalry.
Yee-Joon Kim, Marcia Grabowecky, Satoru Suzuki. Vision Res 2006
86
16

When the brain changes its mind: interocular grouping during binocular rivalry.
I Kovács, T V Papathomas, M Yang, A Fehér. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1996
284
13

Single units and conscious vision.
N K Logothetis. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1998
228
13


Balance between noise and adaptation in competition models of perceptual bistability.
Asya Shpiro, Ruben Moreno-Bote, Nava Rubin, John Rinzel. J Comput Neurosci 2009
101
13


Dynamics of travelling waves in visual perception.
H R Wilson, R Blake, S H Lee. Nature 2001
181
12

Why do ambiguous figures reverse?
I Rock, S Hall, J Davis. Acta Psychol (Amst) 1994
58
20


Visual motion retards alternations between conflicting perceptual interpretations.
Randolph Blake, Kenith V Sobel, Lee A Gilroy. Neuron 2003
79
15


Perception of temporally interleaved ambiguous patterns.
Alexander Maier, Melanie Wilke, Nikos K Logothetis, David A Leopold. Curr Biol 2003
90
13

Attractors and noise: twin drivers of decisions and multistability.
Jochen Braun, Maurizio Mattia. Neuroimage 2010
65
18



Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.