A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

S Kessler, H Kessler, P Ward. Am J Med Genet 1984
Times Cited: 57







List of co-cited articles
213 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity





Goals of genetic counseling.
B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2001
119
10


Perception of carrier status by cystic fibrosis siblings.
J H Fanos, J P Johnson. Am J Hum Genet 1995
68
7

Tay-Sachs screening: social and psychological impact.
B Childs, L Gordis, M M Kaback, H H Kazazian. Am J Hum Genet 1976
53
7

Variation of the CGG repeat at the fragile X site results in genetic instability: resolution of the Sherman paradox.
Y H Fu, D P Kuhl, A Pizzuti, M Pieretti, J S Sutcliffe, S Richards, A J Verkerk, J J Holden, R G Fenwick, S T Warren. Cell 1991
7

Carrier testing in the fragile X syndrome: attitudes and opinions of obligate carriers.
A McConkie-Rosell, G A Spiridigliozzi, T Iafolla, J Tarleton, A M Lachiewicz. Am J Med Genet 1997
45
8

Uncertainty in the information provided during genetic counseling.
F J van Zuuren, E C van Schie, N K van Baaren. Patient Educ Couns 1997
42
9

Genetic counselling: information given, recall and satisfaction.
S Michie, V McDonald, T M Marteau. Patient Educ Couns 1997
53
7



Genetic counseling.
F C Fraser. Am J Hum Genet 1974
184
7



Informed decision making in outpatient practice: time to get back to basics.
C H Braddock, K A Edwards, N M Hasenberg, T L Laidley, W Levinson. JAMA 1999
818
7

Psychological consequences of predictive genetic testing: a systematic review.
M Broadstock, S Michie, T Marteau. Eur J Hum Genet 2000
237
7

A new definition of Genetic Counseling: National Society of Genetic Counselors' Task Force report.
Robert Resta, Barbara Bowles Biesecker, Robin L Bennett, Sandra Blum, Susan Estabrooks Hahn, Michelle N Strecker, Janet L Williams. J Genet Couns 2006
370
7

Parental attitudes toward genetic testing for pediatric deafness.
J W Brunger, G S Murray, M O'Riordan, A L Matthews, R J Smith, N H Robin. Am J Hum Genet 2000
88
7

Psychological impact of false-positive results when screening for cystic fibrosis.
A Tluczek, E H Mischler, B Bowers, N M Peterson, M E Morris, P M Farrell, W T Bruns, H Colby, C McCarthy, N Fost. Pediatr Pulmonol Suppl 1991
38
10

Psychological and social consequences of community carrier screening programme for cystic fibrosis.
E K Watson, E S Mayall, J Lamb, J Chapple, R Williamson. Lancet 1992
88
5


Effects of genetic screening on perceptions of health: a pilot study.
T M Marteau, M van Duijn, I Ellis. J Med Genet 1992
68
5

Direct diagnosis by DNA analysis of the fragile X syndrome of mental retardation.
F Rousseau, D Heitz, V Biancalana, S Blumenfeld, C Kretz, J Boué, N Tommerup, C Van Der Hagen, C DeLozier-Blanchet, M F Croquette. N Engl J Med 1991
585
5



Carrier testing in fragile X syndrome: effect on self-concept.
A McConkie-Rosell, G A Spiridigliozzi, J A Sullivan, D V Dawson, A M Lachiewicz. Am J Med Genet 2000
23
13

Carrier testing and prenatal diagnosis for hemophilia: experiences and attitudes of 549 potential and obligate carriers.
I Varekamp, T P Suurmeijer, A H Bröcker-Vriends, H van Dijck, C Smit, F R Rosendaal, E Briët. Am J Med Genet 1990
48
6

Attitudes toward presymptomatic testing and prenatal diagnosis for adrenoleukodystrophy among affected families.
D Costakos, R K Abramson, J G Edwards, W B Rizzo, R G Best. Am J Med Genet 1991
15
20


Prenatal screening for cystic fibrosis: psychological effects on carriers and their partners.
M E Mennie, M E Compton, A Gilfillan, W A Liston, I Pullen, D A Whyte, D J Brock. J Med Genet 1993
52
5

Nondirectiveness in genetic counseling: an empirical study.
S Michie, F Bron, M Bobrow, T M Marteau. Am J Hum Genet 1997
104
5



Genetic counseling: provision and reception of information.
A Lippman-Hand, F C Fraser. Am J Med Genet 1979
80
5

Goals, benefits, and outcomes of genetic counseling: client and genetic counselor assessment.
B A Bernhardt, B B Biesecker, C L Mastromarino. Am J Med Genet 2000
99
5


Psychological studies in Huntington's disease: making up the balance.
M Duisterhof, R W Trijsburg, M F Niermeijer, R A Roos, A Tibben. J Med Genet 2001
42
7

Psychological distress in the 5-year period after predictive testing for Huntington's disease.
Marleen Decruyenaere, Gerry Evers-Kiebooms, Trees Cloostermans, Andrea Boogaerts, Koen Demyttenaere, René Dom, Jean Pierre Fryns. Eur J Hum Genet 2003
83
5

Parental attitudes regarding carrier testing in children at risk for fragile X syndrome.
A McConkie-Rosell, G A Spiridigliozzi, K Rounds, D V Dawson, J A Sullivan, D Burgess, A M Lachiewicz. Am J Med Genet 1999
37
8

Instability of a 550-base pair DNA segment and abnormal methylation in fragile X syndrome.
I Oberlé, F Rousseau, D Heitz, C Kretz, D Devys, A Hanauer, J Boué, M F Bertheas, J L Mandel. Science 1991
5


Genetic counseling and risk communication services of newborn screening programs.
M Farrell, L Certain, P Farrell. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2001
53
5


Perceived personal control (PPC): a new concept in measuring outcome of genetic counseling.
M Berkenstadt, S Shiloh, G Barkai, M B Katznelson, B Goldman. Am J Med Genet 1999
103
5

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): knowledge, experience, and reproductive decisions of affected patients and families.
C M Benjamin, A Colley, D Donnai, H Kingston, R Harris, L Kerzin-Storrar. J Med Genet 1993
62
5

DNA-testing for Huntington's disease in The Netherlands: a retrospective study on psychosocial effects.
A Tibben, M Vegter-van der Vlis, M I Skraastad, P G Frets, J J van der Kamp, M F Niermeijer, G J van Ommen, R A Roos, H G Rooijmans, D Stronks. Am J Med Genet 1992
74
5

Prenatal diagnosis for inherited deafness--what is the potential demand?
A Middleton, J Hewison, R Mueller. J Genet Couns 2001
42
7

Genetic testing for hearing loss: different motivations for the same outcome.
Orit Dagan, Hagit Hochner, Haya Levi, Annick Raas-Rothschild, Michal Sagi. Am J Med Genet 2002
23
13


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.