P J Bex, G K Edgar, A T Smith. Vision Res 1995
Times Cited: 39
Times Cited: 39
Times Cited
Times Co-cited
Similarity
Sharpness constancy during movement perception (short note).
V S Ramachandran, V M Rao, T R Vidyasagar. Perception 1974
V S Ramachandran, V M Rao, T R Vidyasagar. Perception 1974
75
80
A target in real motion appears blurred in the absence of other proximal moving targets.
S Chen, H E Bedell, H Oğmen. Vision Res 1995
S Chen, H E Bedell, H Oğmen. Vision Res 1995
41
Motion sharpening: evidence for the addition of high spatial frequencies to the effective neural image.
S T Hammett, P J Bex. Vision Res 1996
S T Hammett, P J Bex. Vision Res 1996
76
Shifter circuits: a computational strategy for dynamic aspects of visual processing.
C H Anderson, D C Van Essen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987
C H Anderson, D C Van Essen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1987
30
Motion blur and motion sharpening: temporal smear and local contrast non-linearity.
S T Hammett, M A Georgeson, A Gorea. Vision Res 1998
S T Hammett, M A Georgeson, A Gorea. Vision Res 1998
47
23
Sharpness overconstancy in peripheral vision.
S J Galvin, R P O'Shea, A M Squire, D G Govan. Vision Res 1997
S J Galvin, R P O'Shea, A M Squire, D G Govan. Vision Res 1997
20
Temporal and spatial summation in human vision at different background intensities.
H B BARLOW. J Physiol 1958
H B BARLOW. J Physiol 1958
20
Motion deblurring in a neural network model of retino-cortical dynamics.
G Purushothaman, H Oğmen, S Chen, H E Bedell. Vision Res 1998
G Purushothaman, H Oğmen, S Chen, H E Bedell. Vision Res 1998
22
Suppression of visible persistence in apparent motion.
J H Hogben, V Di Lollo. Percept Psychophys 1985
J H Hogben, V Di Lollo. Percept Psychophys 1985
17
Effect of the ISI on the visible persistence of a stimulus in apparent motion.
E Castet. Vision Res 1994
E Castet. Vision Res 1994
22
Sharpness overconstancy: the roles of visibility and current context.
S J Galvin, R P O'Shea, A M Squire, D S Hailstone. Vision Res 1999
S J Galvin, R P O'Shea, A M Squire, D S Hailstone. Vision Res 1999
37
Seeing blur: 'motion sharpening' without motion.
Mark A Georgeson, Stephen T Hammett. Proc Biol Sci 2002
Mark A Georgeson, Stephen T Hammett. Proc Biol Sci 2002
75
Anticipation of moving stimuli by the retina.
M J Berry, I H Brivanlou, T A Jordan, M Meister. Nature 1999
M J Berry, I H Brivanlou, T A Jordan, M Meister. Nature 1999
15
Flexible retinotopy: motion-dependent position coding in the visual cortex.
David Whitney, Herbert C Goltz, Christopher G Thomas, Joseph S Gati, Ravi S Menon, Melvyn A Goodale. Science 2003
David Whitney, Herbert C Goltz, Christopher G Thomas, Joseph S Gati, Ravi S Menon, Melvyn A Goodale. Science 2003
15
Perceptual grouping induces non-retinotopic feature attribution in human vision.
Haluk Oğmen, Thomas U Otto, Michael H Herzog. Vision Res 2006
Haluk Oğmen, Thomas U Otto, Michael H Herzog. Vision Res 2006
15
Temporal summation of moving images by the human visual system.
D C Burr. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981
D C Burr. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981
12
From filters to features: location, orientation, contrast and blur.
M A Georgeson. Ciba Found Symp 1994
M A Georgeson. Ciba Found Symp 1994
16
Sustained and transient mechanisms in human vision: temporal and spatial properties.
G E Legge. Vision Res 1978
G E Legge. Vision Res 1978
12
The recognition and representation of edge blur: evidence for spatial primitives in human vision.
R J Watt, M J Morgan. Vision Res 1983
R J Watt, M J Morgan. Vision Res 1983
12
Suppression of visible persistence as a function of spatial separation between inducing stimuli.
V Di Lollo, J H Hogben. Percept Psychophys 1987
V Di Lollo, J H Hogben. Percept Psychophys 1987
12
The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies.
D G Pelli. Spat Vis 1997
D G Pelli. Spat Vis 1997
12
12
12
Non-veridical size perception of expanding and contracting objects.
D Whitaker, P V McGraw, S Pearson. Vision Res 1999
D Whitaker, P V McGraw, S Pearson. Vision Res 1999
12
Illusory displacement of equiluminous kinetic edges.
V S Ramachandran, S M Anstis. Perception 1990
V S Ramachandran, S M Anstis. Perception 1990
12
Influence of motion signals on the perceived position of spatial pattern.
S Nishida, A Johnston. Nature 1999
S Nishida, A Johnston. Nature 1999
12
12
Coherent global motion in the absence of coherent velocity signals.
J Ross, D R Badcock, A Hayes. Curr Biol 2000
J Ross, D R Badcock, A Hayes. Curr Biol 2000
12
12
Suppression of visible persistence.
Vincent Di Lollo, John H Hogben. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985
Vincent Di Lollo, John H Hogben. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985
12
The flight path of the phoenix--the visible trace of invisible elements in human vision.
Thomas U Otto, Haluk Oğmen, Michael H Herzog. J Vis 2006
Thomas U Otto, Haluk Oğmen, Michael H Herzog. J Vis 2006
12
Implications of sustained and transient channels for theories of visual pattern masking, saccadic suppression, and information processing.
B G Breitmeyer, L Ganz. Psychol Rev 1976
B G Breitmeyer, L Ganz. Psychol Rev 1976
10
Cortical dynamics of feature binding and reset: control of visual persistence.
G Francis, S Grossberg, E Mingolla. Vision Res 1994
G Francis, S Grossberg, E Mingolla. Vision Res 1994
10
44
Contrast gain control in the primate retina: P cells are not X-like, some M cells are.
E A Benardete, E Kaplan, B W Knight. Vis Neurosci 1992
E A Benardete, E Kaplan, B W Knight. Vis Neurosci 1992
10
Motion distorts visual space: shifting the perceived position of remote stationary objects.
D Whitney, P Cavanagh. Nat Neurosci 2000
D Whitney, P Cavanagh. Nat Neurosci 2000
10
The visible persistence of stimuli in stroboscopic motion.
J E Farrell, M Pavel, G Sperling. Vision Res 1990
J E Farrell, M Pavel, G Sperling. Vision Res 1990
11
Direct evidence that "speedlines" influence motion mechanisms.
David C Burr, John Ross. J Neurosci 2002
David C Burr, John Ross. J Neurosci 2002
10
Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.