A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

R Desimone, J Duncan. Annu Rev Neurosci 1995
Times Cited: 4297







List of co-cited articles
781 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain.
Maurizio Corbetta, Gordon L Shulman. Nat Rev Neurosci 2002
20

Visual attention: the past 25 years.
Marisa Carrasco. Vision Res 2011
843
16

The Psychophysics Toolbox.
D H Brainard. Spat Vis 1997
14

An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function.
E K Miller, J D Cohen. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001
13

Visual search and stimulus similarity.
J Duncan, G W Humphreys. Psychol Rev 1989
13

A feature-integration theory of attention.
A M Treisman, G Gelade. Cogn Psychol 1980
13

A theory of visual attention.
C Bundesen. Psychol Rev 1990
956
13

Orienting of attention.
M I Posner. Q J Exp Psychol 1980
12


Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.
Edward Awh, Artem V Belopolsky, Jan Theeuwes. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
610
11

Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings.
C L Folk, R W Remington, J C Johnston. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1992
9

Computational modelling of visual attention.
L Itti, C Koch. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001
9

Perceptual selectivity for color and form.
J Theeuwes. Percept Psychophys 1992
866
9



PsychoPy--Psychophysics software in Python.
Jonathan W Peirce. J Neurosci Methods 2007
8


From Behavior to Neural Dynamics: An Integrated Theory of Attention.
Timothy J Buschman, Sabine Kastner. Neuron 2015
108
7


Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection.
Jan Theeuwes. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2010
581
7


A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology.
Claus Bundesen, Thomas Habekost, Soren Kyllingsbaek. Psychol Rev 2005
346
7

Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory.
Adam Gazzaley, Anna C Nobre. Trends Cogn Sci 2012
596
7








Electrophysiological indices of target and distractor processing in visual search.
Clayton Hickey, Vincent Di Lollo, John J McDonald. J Cogn Neurosci 2009
314
6

Attentional templates in visual working memory.
Nancy B Carlisle, Jason T Arita, Deborah Pardo, Geoffrey F Woodman. J Neurosci 2011
165
6



Context-dependent computation by recurrent dynamics in prefrontal cortex.
Valerio Mante, David Sussillo, Krishna V Shenoy, William T Newsome. Nature 2013
522
6


Value-driven attentional capture.
Brian A Anderson, Patryk A Laurent, Steven Yantis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011
539
5

ERPLAB: an open-source toolbox for the analysis of event-related potentials.
Javier Lopez-Calderon, Steven J Luck. Front Hum Neurosci 2014
851
5

Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory.
Edward K Vogel, Andrew W McCollough, Maro G Machizawa. Nature 2005
739
5

Guided search: an alternative to the feature integration model for visual search.
J M Wolfe, K R Cave, S L Franzel. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1989
5


Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate.
Clayton Hickey, Leonardo Chelazzi, Jan Theeuwes. J Neurosci 2010
350
5

Neural Mechanisms of Selective Visual Attention.
Tirin Moore, Marc Zirnsak. Annu Rev Psychol 2017
94
5

Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex.
S Kastner, L G Ungerleider. Annu Rev Neurosci 2000
5


Direct neurophysiological evidence for spatial suppression surrounding the focus of attention in vision.
J-M Hopf, C N Boehler, S J Luck, J K Tsotsos, H-J Heinze, M A Schoenfeld. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2006
148
5


Direct Evidence for Active Suppression of Salient-but-Irrelevant Sensory Inputs.
Nicholas Gaspelin, Carly J Leonard, Steven J Luck. Psychol Sci 2015
100
5


The N2pc component as an indicator of attentional selectivity.
M Eimer. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996
605
5


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.