A citation-based method for searching scientific literature


List of co-cited articles
500 articles co-cited >1



Times Cited
  Times     Co-cited
Similarity


The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception and mental health in women with a family history of breast cancer.
M Watson, S Lloyd, J Davidson, L Meyer, R Eeles, S Ebbs, V Murday. Br J Cancer 1999
182
40

Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress.
M Horowitz, N Wilner, W Alvarez. Psychosom Med 1979
37

Psychological distress and surveillance behaviors of women with a family history of breast cancer.
K M Kash, J C Holland, M S Halper, D G Miller. J Natl Cancer Inst 1992
430
36

Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial.
C Lerman, E Lustbader, B Rimer, M Daly, S Miller, C Sands, A Balshem. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995
345
24

Predictors of intrusive thoughts and avoidance in women with family histories of breast cancer.
S G Zakowski, H B Valdimarsdottir, D H Bovbjerg, P Borgen, J Holland, K Kash, D Miller, J Mitnick, M Osborne, K Van Zee. Ann Behav Med 1997
110
23

Mammography adherence and psychological distress among women at risk for breast cancer.
C Lerman, M Daly, C Sands, A Balshem, E Lustbader, T Heggan, L Goldstein, J James, P Engstrom. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993
350
22

The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.
A Cull, E D Anderson, S Campbell, J Mackay, E Smyth, M Steel. Br J Cancer 1999
120
22

The hospital anxiety and depression scale.
A S Zigmond, R P Snaith. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983
22

The impact of genetic counselling on risk perception in women with a family history of breast cancer.
D G Evans, V Blair, R Greenhalgh, P Hopwood, A Howell. Br J Cancer 1994
137
21

Psychological support needs for women at high genetic risk of breast cancer: some preliminary indicators.
P Hopwood, F Keeling, A Long, C Pool, G Evans, A Howell. Psychooncology 1998
89
22


Family history of breast cancer: what do women understand and recall about their genetic risk?
M Watson, V Duvivier, M Wade Walsh, S Ashley, J Davidson, M Papaikonomou, V Murday, N Sacks, R Eeles. J Med Genet 1998
109
16


Randomized trial of a specialist genetic assessment service for familial breast cancer.
K Brain, J Gray, P Norman, E France, C Anglim, G Barton, E Parsons, A Clarke, H Sweetland, M Tischkowitz,[...]. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000
69
20

BRCA1 testing in families with hereditary breast-ovarian cancer. A prospective study of patient decision making and outcomes.
C Lerman, S Narod, K Schulman, C Hughes, A Gomez-Caminero, G Bonney, K Gold, B Trock, D Main, J Lynch,[...]. JAMA 1996
599
14

Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.
M H Gail, L A Brinton, D P Byar, D K Corle, S B Green, C Schairer, J J Mulvihill. J Natl Cancer Inst 1989
13


Perception of risk in women with a family history of breast cancer.
D G Evans, L D Burnell, P Hopwood, A Howell. Br J Cancer 1993
141
12

Looking forward and back: distress among women at familial risk for breast cancer.
J Erblich, D H Bovbjerg, H B Valdimarsdottir. Ann Behav Med 2000
93
12



Attitudes about genetic testing for breast-ovarian cancer susceptibility.
C Lerman, M Daly, A Masny, A Balshem. J Clin Oncol 1994
426
11

A strong candidate for the breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility gene BRCA1.
Y Miki, J Swensen, D Shattuck-Eidens, P A Futreal, K Harshman, S Tavtigian, Q Liu, C Cochran, L M Bennett, W Ding. Science 1994
11

Controlled trial of pretest education approaches to enhance informed decision-making for BRCA1 gene testing.
C Lerman, B Biesecker, J L Benkendorf, J Kerner, A Gomez-Caminero, C Hughes, M M Reed. J Natl Cancer Inst 1997
270
11



Genetic heterogeneity and penetrance analysis of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes in breast cancer families. The Breast Cancer Linkage Consortium.
D Ford, D F Easton, M Stratton, S Narod, D Goldgar, P Devilee, D T Bishop, B Weber, G Lenoir, J Chang-Claude,[...]. Am J Hum Genet 1998
10

Psychological counseling strategies for women at risk of breast cancer.
K M Kash, J C Holland, M P Osborne, D G Miller. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1995
57
17

Identification of the breast cancer susceptibility gene BRCA2.
R Wooster, G Bignell, J Lancaster, S Swift, S Seal, J Mangion, N Collins, S Gregory, C Gumbs, G Micklem. Nature 1995
10


Psychological impact of receiving a BRCA1/BRCA2 test result.
L Lodder, P G Frets, R W Trijsburg, E J Meijers-Heijboer, J G Klijn, H J Duivenvoorden, A Tibben, A Wagner, C A van der Meer, A M van den Ouweland,[...]. Am J Med Genet 2001
114
10

Psychological impact of genetic counseling for familial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Dejana Braithwaite, Jon Emery, Fiona Walter, A Toby Prevost, Stephen Sutton. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004
131
10

Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening.
C Lerman, B Trock, B K Rimer, C Jepson, D Brody, A Boyce. Health Psychol 1991
389
9


Psychological responses to BRCA1 mutation testing: preliminary findings.
R T Croyle, K R Smith, J R Botkin, B Baty, J Nash. Health Psychol 1997
242
9

What is the relationship between breast cancer risk and mammography screening? A meta-analytic review.
K D McCaul, A D Branstetter, D M Schroeder, R E Glasgow. Health Psychol 1996
256
9

The use of videotaped information in cancer genetic counselling: a randomized evaluation study.
A Cull, H Miller, T Porterfield, J Mackay, E D Anderson, C M Steel, R A Elton. Br J Cancer 1998
97
9

Genetic counseling for women with an intermediate family history of breast cancer.
W Burke, J O Culver, D Bowen, D Lowry, S Durfy, A McTiernan, M R Andersen. Am J Med Genet 2000
75
12


Changes in psychological distress after cancer genetic counselling: a comparison of affected and unaffected women.
A Bish, S Sutton, C Jacobs, S Levene, A Ramirez, S Hodgson. Br J Cancer 2002
81
11

Attitudes and interest in genetic testing for breast and ovarian cancer susceptibility in diverse groups of women in western Washington.
S J Durfy, D J Bowen, A McTiernan, J Sporleder, W Burke. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 1999
145
8

Why do women attend familial breast cancer clinics?
K Brain, J Gray, P Norman, E Parsons, A Clarke, C Rogers, R Mansel, P Harper. J Med Genet 2000
85
9

Psychological and behavioral implications of abnormal mammograms.
C Lerman, B Trock, B K Rimer, A Boyce, C Jepson, P F Engstrom. Ann Intern Med 1991
393
8

Presymptomatic testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2: how distressing are the pre-test weeks? Rotterdam/Leiden Genetics Working Group.
L N Lodder, P G Frets, R W Trijsburg, E J Meijers-Heijboer, J G Klijn, H J Duivenvoorden, A Tibben, A Wagner, C A van der Meer, P Devilee,[...]. J Med Genet 1999
60
13

The impact of a brief problem-solving training intervention for relatives of recently diagnosed breast cancer patients.
M D Schwartz, C Lerman, J Audrain, D Cella, B Rimer, M Stefanek, J Garber, T H Lin, V Vogel. Ann Behav Med 1998
45
17

Intention to undergo prophylactic bilateral mastectomy in women at increased risk of developing hereditary breast cancer.
B Meiser, P Butow, M Friedlander, V Schnieden, M Gattas, J Kirk, G Suthers, E Haan, K Tucker. J Clin Oncol 2000
90
8

Attitudes, knowledge, and risk perceptions of women with breast and/or ovarian cancer considering testing for BRCA1 and BRCA2.
L G Bluman, B K Rimer, D A Berry, N Borstelmann, J D Iglehart, K Regan, J Schildkraut, E P Winer. J Clin Oncol 1999
105
8


Long-term psychological impact of carrying a BRCA1/2 mutation and prophylactic surgery: a 5-year follow-up study.
Iris van Oostrom, Hanne Meijers-Heijboer, Litanja N Lodder, Hugo J Duivenvoorden, Arthur R van Gool, Caroline Seynaeve, Conny A van der Meer, Jan G M Klijn, Bert N van Geel, Curt W Burger,[...]. J Clin Oncol 2003
191
8

Genetic analysis of breast cancer in the cancer and steroid hormone study.
E B Claus, N Risch, W D Thompson. Am J Hum Genet 1991
748
7


Co-cited is the co-citation frequency, indicating how many articles cite the article together with the query article. Similarity is the co-citation as percentage of the times cited of the query article or the article in the search results, whichever is the lowest. These numbers are calculated for the last 100 citations when articles are cited more than 100 times.