A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 124

Juli Murphy Bollinger, Joan Scott, Rachel Dvoskin, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2012
Times Cited: 142

List of shared articles

Times cited

Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.
Danya F Vears, Joel T Minion, Stephanie J Roberts, James Cummings, Mavis Machirori, Madeleine J Murtagh. Per Med 2021

Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants.
Ciara Staunton, Maria Kösters, Peter P Pramstaller, Deborah Mascalzoni. J Community Genet 2021

Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary genetic findings about themselves.
Will Schupmann, Skye A Miner, Haley K Sullivan, Jamie R Glover, Janet E Hall, Shepherd H Schurman, Benjamin E Berkman. Genet Med 2021

Participants' Preferences and Reasons for Wanting Feedback of Individual Genetic Research Results From an HIV-TB Genomic Study: A Case Study From Botswana.
Dimpho Ralefala, Mary Kasule, Olivia P Matshabane, Ambroise Wonkam, Mogomotsi Matshaba, Jantina de Vries. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2021

Return of individual research results from genomic research: A systematic review of stakeholder perspectives.
Danya F Vears, Joel T Minion, Stephanie J Roberts, James Cummings, Mavis Machirori, Mwenza Blell, Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Lorraine Cowley, Stephanie O M Dyke, Clara Gaff,[...]. PLoS One 2021

Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.
Nadine Umbach, Tim Beißbarth, Annalen Bleckmann, Gunnar Duttge, Laura Flatau, Alexander König, Jessica Kuhn, Julia Perera-Bel, Julia Roschauer, Thomas G Schulze,[...]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2020

Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
Julian J Koplin, Julian Savulescu, Danya F Vears. BMC Med Ethics 2020

Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
Dimpho Ralefala, Mary Kasule, Ambroise Wonkam, Mogomotsi Matshaba, Jantina de Vries. BMC Med Ethics 2020

Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019

Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results.
Robyn Hylind, Maureen Smith, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Sharon Aufox. J Community Genet 2018

Cancer patients' intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing.
Rhodé M Bijlsma, Hester Wessels, Roel H P Wouters, Anne M May, Margreet G E M Ausems, Emile E Voest, Annelien L Bredenoord. Fam Cancer 2018

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018

"I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.
M Vornanen, K Aktan-Collan, N Hallowell, H Konttinen, H Kääriäinen, A Haukkala. J Community Genet 2018

Patients' Attitudes Towards the Return of Incidental Findings After Research with Residual Tissue: A Mixed Methods Study.
Eric Vermeulen, Susanne Rebers, Neil K Aaronson, Alexander P Brandenburg, Flora E van Leeuwen, Marjanka K Schmidt. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2018

Managing unsolicited findings in genomics: A qualitative interview study with cancer patients.
R M Bijlsma, R H P Wouters, H Wessels, A M May, M G E M Ausems, E E Voest, A L Bredenoord. Psychooncology 2018

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018

Genomic information and a person's right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample.
Laura Flatau, Markus Reitt, Gunnar Duttge, Christian Lenk, Barbara Zoll, Wolfgang Poser, Alexandra Weber, Urs Heilbronner, Marcella Rietschel, Jana Strohmaier,[...]. PLoS One 2018

Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance.
Wylie Burke, Laura M Beskow, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen Brelsford. J Law Med Ethics 2018

What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies.
Courtney L Scherr, Sharon Aufox, Amy A Ross, Sanjana Ramesh, Catherine A Wicklund, Maureen Smith. Healthcare (Basel) 2018

Acceptability of Electronic Visits for Return of Research Results in the Mayo Clinic Biobank.
Janet E Olson, Euijung Ryu, Kelly J Lyke, Suzette J Bielinski, Erin M Winkler, Matthew A Hathcock, Joshua T Bublitz, Paul Y Takahashi, James R Cerhan. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018

Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing.
Michele C Gornick, Aaron M Scherer, Erica J Sutton, Kerry A Ryan, Nicole L Exe, Ming Li, Wendy R Uhlmann, Scott Y H Kim, J Scott Roberts, Raymond G De Vries. J Genet Couns 2017

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.
Jennefer N Kohler, Erin Turbitt, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017

Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.
Melanie F Myers, Xue Zhang, Brooke McLaughlin, Diane Kissell, Cassandra L Perry, Matthew Veerkamp, Kejian Zhang, Ingrid A Holm, Cynthia A Prows. Pharmacogenomics 2017

Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.
Laura A Siminoff, Heather M Traino, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura Barker, Glencora Gudger, Anita Undale. Genet Med 2016

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.
Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Phuong L Mai, June A Peters, Neelam Giri, Douglas R Stewart, Mark H Greene, Blanche P Alter, Sharon A Savage. Genet Med 2016

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015

Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results.
Jennifer M Taber, William M P Klein, Rebecca A Ferrer, Paul K J Han, Katie L Lewis, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. J Behav Med 2015

Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.
Katie L Lewis, Paul K J Han, Gillian W Hooker, William M P Klein, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. PLoS One 2015

Whole exome sequencing and functional studies identify an intronic mutation in TRAPPC2 that causes SEDT.
E E Davis, J H Savage, J R Willer, Y-H Jiang, M Angrist, A Androutsopoulos, N Katsanis. Clin Genet 2014