A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Jonathan S Berg, Muin J Khoury, James P Evans. Genet. Med. 2011
Times Cited: 328



Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2013
Times Cited: 107




List of shared articles



Times cited

Participant choices for return of genomic results in the eMERGE Network.
Christin Hoell, Julia Wynn, Luke V Rasmussen, Keith Marsolo, Sharon A Aufox, Wendy K Chung, John J Connolly, Robert R Freimuth, David Kochan, Hakon Hakonarson,[...]. Genet Med 2020
0

Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
3

Using the diffusion of innovations model to guide participant engagement in the genomics era.
Katie L Lewis, Flavia M Facio, Courtney D Berrios. J Genet Couns 2019
0

Exome sequencing in clinical settings: preferences and experiences of parents of children with rare diseases (SEQUAPRE study).
Aline Chassagne, Aurore Pélissier, Françoise Houdayer, Elodie Cretin, Elodie Gautier, Dominique Salvi, Sarah Kidri, Aurélie Godard, Christel Thauvin-Robinet, Alice Masurel,[...]. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2019
1

Beyond medical actionability: Public perceptions of important actions in response to hypothetical genetic testing results.
David J Seiffert, Patricia McCarthy Veach, Bonnie LeRoy, Weihua Guan, Heather Zierhut. J Genet Couns 2019
0

Development of patient "profiles" to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results.
Chloe Mighton, Lindsay Carlsson, Marc Clausen, Selina Casalino, Salma Shickh, Laura McCuaig, Esha Joshi, Seema Panchal, Tracy Graham, Melyssa Aronson,[...]. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2019
3

Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial.
Salma Shickh, Marc Clausen, Chloe Mighton, Mariana Gutierrez Salazar, Kathleen-Rose Zakoor, Rita Kodida, Emma Reble, Christine Elser, Andrea Eisen, Seema Panchal,[...]. BMJ Open 2019
2

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet. Med. 2018
8

My46: a Web-based tool for self-guided management of genomic test results in research and clinical settings.
Holly K Tabor, Seema M Jamal, Joon-Ho Yu, Julia M Crouch, Aditi G Shankar, Karin M Dent, Nick Anderson, Damon A Miller, Brett T Futral, Michael J Bamshad. Genet. Med. 2017
16


Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
11

Participant Attitudes Toward an Intensive Trial of Multiple Biopsies, Multidimensional Molecular Analysis, and Reporting of Results in Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer.
Nicole M Kuderer, Kimberly A Burton, Sibel Blau, Francis Senecal, Vijayakrishna K Gadi, Stephanie Parker, Elisabeth Mahen, David Veenstra, Josh J Carlson, Gary H Lyman,[...].  2017
0

Acceptability of, and Information Needs Regarding, Next-Generation Sequencing in People Tested for Hereditary Cancer: A Qualitative Study.
Bettina Meiser, Ben Storey, Veronica Quinn, Belinda Rahman, Lesley Andrews. J Genet Couns 2016
7