A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 122



Juli Murphy Bollinger, Joan Scott, Rachel Dvoskin, David Kaufman. Genet Med 2012
Times Cited: 135




List of shared articles



Times cited

Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.
Danya F Vears, Joel T Minion, Stephanie J Roberts, James Cummings, Mavis Machirori, Madeleine J Murtagh. Per Med 2021
0

Return of research results (RoRR) to the healthy CHRIS cohort: designing a policy with the participants.
Ciara Staunton, Maria Kösters, Peter P Pramstaller, Deborah Mascalzoni. J Community Genet 2021
0

Exploring the motivations of research participants who chose not to learn medically actionable secondary genetic findings about themselves.
Will Schupmann, Skye A Miner, Haley K Sullivan, Jamie R Glover, Janet E Hall, Shepherd H Schurman, Benjamin E Berkman. Genet Med 2021
0

Clinical application of genomic high-throughput data: Infrastructural, ethical, legal and psychosocial aspects.
Nadine Umbach, Tim Beißbarth, Annalen Bleckmann, Gunnar Duttge, Laura Flatau, Alexander König, Jessica Kuhn, Julia Perera-Bel, Julia Roschauer, Thomas G Schulze,[...]. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2020
2

Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
Julian J Koplin, Julian Savulescu, Danya F Vears. BMC Med Ethics 2020
4

Do solidarity and reciprocity obligations compel African researchers to feedback individual genetic results in genomics research?
Dimpho Ralefala, Mary Kasule, Ambroise Wonkam, Mogomotsi Matshaba, Jantina de Vries. BMC Med Ethics 2020
2

Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
6

Great expectations: patient perspectives and anticipated utility of non-diagnostic genomic-sequencing results.
Robyn Hylind, Maureen Smith, Laura Rasmussen-Torvik, Sharon Aufox. J Community Genet 2018
10

Cancer patients' intentions towards receiving unsolicited genetic information obtained using next-generation sequencing.
Rhodé M Bijlsma, Hester Wessels, Roel H P Wouters, Anne M May, Margreet G E M Ausems, Emile E Voest, Annelien L Bredenoord. Fam Cancer 2018
9

The who, what, and why of research participants' intentions to request a broad range of secondary findings in a diagnostic genomic sequencing study.
Christine Rini, Cynthia M Khan, Elizabeth Moore, Myra I Roche, James P Evans, Jonathan S Berg, Bradford C Powell, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Ann Katherine M Foreman, Ida Griesemer,[...]. Genet Med 2018
13

"I would like to discuss it further with an expert": a focus group study of Finnish adults' perspectives on genetic secondary findings.
M Vornanen, K Aktan-Collan, N Hallowell, H Konttinen, H Kääriäinen, A Haukkala. J Community Genet 2018
3

Patients' Attitudes Towards the Return of Incidental Findings After Research with Residual Tissue: A Mixed Methods Study.
Eric Vermeulen, Susanne Rebers, Neil K Aaronson, Alexander P Brandenburg, Flora E van Leeuwen, Marjanka K Schmidt. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers 2018
3

Managing unsolicited findings in genomics: A qualitative interview study with cancer patients.
R M Bijlsma, R H P Wouters, H Wessels, A M May, M G E M Ausems, E E Voest, A L Bredenoord. Psychooncology 2018
9

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018
15

Genomic information and a person's right not to know: A closer look at variations in hypothetical informational preferences in a German sample.
Laura Flatau, Markus Reitt, Gunnar Duttge, Christian Lenk, Barbara Zoll, Wolfgang Poser, Alexandra Weber, Urs Heilbronner, Marcella Rietschel, Jana Strohmaier,[...]. PLoS One 2018
5

Informed Consent in Translational Genomics: Insufficient Without Trustworthy Governance.
Wylie Burke, Laura M Beskow, Susan Brown Trinidad, Stephanie M Fullerton, Kathleen Brelsford. J Law Med Ethics 2018
10

What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies.
Courtney L Scherr, Sharon Aufox, Amy A Ross, Sanjana Ramesh, Catherine A Wicklund, Maureen Smith. Healthcare (Basel) 2018
11

Acceptability of Electronic Visits for Return of Research Results in the Mayo Clinic Biobank.
Janet E Olson, Euijung Ryu, Kelly J Lyke, Suzette J Bielinski, Erin M Winkler, Matthew A Hathcock, Joshua T Bublitz, Paul Y Takahashi, James R Cerhan. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes 2018
2

Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing.
Michele C Gornick, Aaron M Scherer, Erica J Sutton, Kerry A Ryan, Nicole L Exe, Ming Li, Wendy R Uhlmann, Scott Y H Kim, J Scott Roberts, Raymond G De Vries. J Genet Couns 2017
13

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
20

Personal utility in genomic testing: a systematic literature review.
Jennefer N Kohler, Erin Turbitt, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
53

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
12

Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.
Melanie F Myers, Xue Zhang, Brooke McLaughlin, Diane Kissell, Cassandra L Perry, Matthew Veerkamp, Kejian Zhang, Ingrid A Holm, Cynthia A Prows. Pharmacogenomics 2017
1

Family decision maker perspectives on the return of genetic results in biobanking research.
Laura A Siminoff, Heather M Traino, Maghboeba Mosavel, Laura Barker, Glencora Gudger, Anita Undale. Genet Med 2016
16

Motivations, concerns and preferences of personal genome sequencing research participants: Baseline findings from the HealthSeq project.
Saskia C Sanderson, Michael D Linderman, Sabrina A Suckiel, George A Diaz, Randi E Zinberg, Kadija Ferryman, Melissa Wasserstein, Andrew Kasarskis, Eric E Schadt. Eur J Hum Genet 2016
49

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.
Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Phuong L Mai, June A Peters, Neelam Giri, Douglas R Stewart, Mark H Greene, Blanche P Alter, Sharon A Savage. Genet Med 2016
14

Societal preferences for the return of incidental findings from clinical genomic sequencing: a discrete-choice experiment.
Dean A Regier, Stuart J Peacock, Reka Pataky, Kimberly van der Hoek, Gail P Jarvik, Jeffrey Hoch, David Veenstra. CMAJ 2015
53

Perceived ambiguity as a barrier to intentions to learn genome sequencing results.
Jennifer M Taber, William M P Klein, Rebecca A Ferrer, Paul K J Han, Katie L Lewis, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. J Behav Med 2015
28

Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.
Katie L Lewis, Paul K J Han, Gillian W Hooker, William M P Klein, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. PLoS One 2015
33

Whole exome sequencing and functional studies identify an intronic mutation in TRAPPC2 that causes SEDT.
E E Davis, J H Savage, J R Willer, Y-H Jiang, M Angrist, A Androutsopoulos, N Katsanis. Clin Genet 2014
8

Stakeholders' opinions on the implementation of pediatric whole exome sequencing: implications for informed consent.
Brooke L Levenseller, Danielle J Soucier, Victoria A Miller, Diana Harris, Laura Conway, Barbara A Bernhardt. J Genet Couns 2014
53