A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 122

J C Sapp, D Dong, C Stark, L E Ivey, G Hooker, L G Biesecker, B B Biesecker. Clin Genet 2014
Times Cited: 86

List of shared articles

Times cited

Parents, their children, whole exome sequencing and unsolicited findings: growing towards the child's future autonomy.
Aad Tibben, Wybo Dondorp, Candice Cornelis, Nine Knoers, Eva Brilstra, Marieke van Summeren, Ineke Bolt. Eur J Hum Genet 2021

Views on genomic research result delivery methods and informed consent: a review.
Danya F Vears, Joel T Minion, Stephanie J Roberts, James Cummings, Mavis Machirori, Madeleine J Murtagh. Per Med 2021

Participant choices for return of genomic results in the eMERGE Network.
Christin Hoell, Julia Wynn, Luke V Rasmussen, Keith Marsolo, Sharon A Aufox, Wendy K Chung, John J Connolly, Robert R Freimuth, David Kochan, Hakon Hakonarson,[...]. Genet Med 2020

Much ado about nothing: A qualitative study of the experiences of an average-risk population receiving results of exome sequencing.
Shannon Rego, Orit Dagan-Rosenfeld, Stephanie A Bivona, Michael P Snyder, Kelly E Ormond. J Genet Couns 2019

Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.
Michelle L McGowan, Cynthia A Prows, Melissa DeJonckheere, William B Brinkman, Lisa Vaughn, Melanie F Myers. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2018

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017

Prior opioid exposure influences parents' sharing of their children's CYP2D6 research results.
Melanie F Myers, Xue Zhang, Brooke McLaughlin, Diane Kissell, Cassandra L Perry, Matthew Veerkamp, Kejian Zhang, Ingrid A Holm, Cynthia A Prows. Pharmacogenomics 2017

When Participants in Genomic Research Grow Up: Contact and Consent at the Age of Majority.
Kyle B Brothers, Ingrid A Holm, Janet E Childerhose, Armand H M Antommaria, Barbara A Bernhardt, Ellen Wright Clayton, Bruce D Gelb, Steven Joffe, John A Lynch, Jennifer B McCormick,[...]. J Pediatr 2016

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.
Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Phuong L Mai, June A Peters, Neelam Giri, Douglas R Stewart, Mark H Greene, Blanche P Alter, Sharon A Savage. Genet Med 2016

Research participants in NGS studies want to know about incidental findings.
Anne Marie Jelsig, Niels Qvist, Klaus Brusgaard, Lilian Bomme Ousager. Eur J Hum Genet 2015

Overcoming challenges to meaningful informed consent for whole genome sequencing in pediatric cancer research.
Jennifer A Oberg, Julia L Glade Bender, Elizabeth G Cohn, Marilyn Morris, Jenny Ruiz, Wendy K Chung, Paul S Appelbaum, Andrew L Kung, Jennifer M Levine. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2015

Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015