A citation-based method for searching scientific literature

Flavia M Facio, Haley Eidem, Tyler Fisher, Stephanie Brooks, Amy Linn, Kimberly A Kaphingst, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. Eur J Hum Genet 2013
Times Cited: 122







List of shared articles



Times cited

A survey of aortic disease biorepository participants' preferences for return of research genetic results.
Jamie Love-Nichols, Wendy R Uhlmann, Patricia Arscott, Cristen Willer, Whitney Hornsby, J Scott Roberts. J Genet Couns 2021
2

Why genomics researchers are sometimes morally required to hunt for secondary findings.
Julian J Koplin, Julian Savulescu, Danya F Vears. BMC Med Ethics 2020
4

Should Researchers Offer Results to Family Members of Cancer Biobank Participants? A Mixed-Methods Study of Proband and Family Preferences.
Deborah R Gordon, Carmen Radecki Breitkopf, Marguerite Robinson, Wesley O Petersen, Jason S Egginton, Kari G Chaffee, Gloria M Petersen, Susan M Wolf, Barbara A Koenig. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019
6

What People Want to Know About Their Genes: A Critical Review of the Literature on Large-Scale Genome Sequencing Studies.
Courtney L Scherr, Sharon Aufox, Amy A Ross, Sanjana Ramesh, Catherine A Wicklund, Maureen Smith. Healthcare (Basel) 2018
11

Effect of Public Deliberation on Attitudes toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing.
Michele C Gornick, Aaron M Scherer, Erica J Sutton, Kerry A Ryan, Nicole L Exe, Ming Li, Wendy R Uhlmann, Scott Y H Kim, J Scott Roberts, Raymond G De Vries. J Genet Couns 2017
12

Stakeholder views on secondary findings in whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.
Michael P Mackley, Benjamin Fletcher, Michael Parker, Hugh Watkins, Elizabeth Ormondroyd. Genet Med 2017
67

Choices for return of primary and secondary genomic research results of 790 members of families with Mendelian disease.
Katie Fiallos, Carolyn Applegate, Debra Jh Mathews, Juli Bollinger, Amanda L Bergner, Cynthia A James. Eur J Hum Genet 2017
20

Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.
Kerry A Ryan, Raymond G De Vries, Wendy R Uhlmann, J Scott Roberts, Michele C Gornick. J Genet Couns 2017
12


Feedback of Individual Genetic Results to Research Participants: Is It Feasible in Europe?
Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne, Deborah Mascalzoni, Sirpa Soini, Helena Machado, Jane Kaye, Heidi Beate Bentzen, Emmanuelle Rial-Sebbag, Flavio D'Abramo, Michał Witt, Geneviève Schamps,[...]. Biopreserv Biobank 2016
13

Research participant interest in primary, secondary, and incidental genomic findings.
Jennifer T Loud, Renee C Bremer, Phuong L Mai, June A Peters, Neelam Giri, Douglas R Stewart, Mark H Greene, Blanche P Alter, Sharon A Savage. Genet Med 2016
14

Characterizing Participants in the ClinSeq Genome Sequencing Cohort as Early Adopters of a New Health Technology.
Katie L Lewis, Paul K J Han, Gillian W Hooker, William M P Klein, Leslie G Biesecker, Barbara B Biesecker. PLoS One 2015
32


Patients' views on incidental findings from clinical exome sequencing.
Kristin E Clift, Colin M E Halverson, Alexander S Fiksdal, Ashok Kumbamu, Richard R Sharp, Jennifer B McCormick. Appl Transl Genom 2015
57